Reality vs Virtual Reality

Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Emeritus Professor of Geography at California State University: - What is the true nature of the hypothesis of Anthropogenic Global Warming Climate Change Climate Disruption Global Weirding? Is it scientific? 

Or is it essentially political? 

Joining us to affirm the latter, and to express his concerns about current geo-engineering programmes, is Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Emeritus Professor of Geography at California State University, Stanislaus, and long-time researcher in Quaternary Paleoclimatology.

Website: The Mind Renewed


Interview Notes:

Published on Jun 25, 2013

Warming is good, Carbon Dioxide is good, The Great Global Warming Swindle,  Tim Ball, Lies, Grant Money,


  1. My problems with his statements from the first 15 minutes: 1. At a certain level CO2 stops benefiting plants. 2. CO2 levels in the ocean increase acidity. 3. If you look at CO2 levels and temperature levels next to each other over Quaternary glacial cycles, there is an obvious coupling. What concerns those if us who "get our hands dirty" collecting paleoclimate data and concern ourselves with the long term record are concerned with this relationship for 2 reasons. First our current level of CO2 is higher than during the last interglacial. The last interglacial was warmer and sea levels were 6 m higher that today. The other reason is the rate of change in the level of CO2 and temperature. During the Quaternary temperatures and CO2 levels changed much more slowly, a millenium instead of a century. That gives plants and animals time to respond and feedback mechanisms time to equilibrate. Also the rate and magnitude of change in temperature and CO2 over the "Medieval Warm Period" isn't near what is today.


Post a Comment

All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!