We are a shoe-string operation. Unfortunately no BigOil funding! Help expose the hoax.

Westpac BSB 035612, Account No. 239469

All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled. Dr David Deming

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf

Sunday, 29 November 2015

Father of #AGWHoax, Maurice Strong dead.

TORONTO (AP) (LINK) — Maurice Strong, whose work helped lead to the landmark climate summit that begins in Paris on Monday, has died at age 86, the head of the U.N.'s environmental agency said Saturday.
The Canadian-born Strong, the first U.N. Environment Program chief, organized the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, which led to the launch of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change.

Strong's Energy Fortune

Strong made his fortune in the oil and energy business running companies such as Petro Canada, Power Corporation, CalTex Africa, Hydro Canada, the Colorado Land and Cattle Company, Ajax Petroleum, Canadian Industrial Oil and Gas— to name just a few.
Christiana Figueres, the current head of the U.N. climate agency, tweeted Saturday that "we thank Maurice Strong for his visionary impetus to our understanding of sustainability. We will miss you." 
This is the same Christiana Figueres who sent out a press release in February saying that the environmental movement was not about the environment but it was to destroy capitalism, (LINK)

It was ever thus.

Before setting up the structure for the hoax, Maurice Strong spoke re the Club of Rome:
What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? ..... 
In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrial civilizations collapse. Isn't it our responsibility to bring this about? (LINK)
And again to National Revue Magazine 1/9/97
Frankly, we may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrial civilization to collapse.
The same Maurice Strong has been hiding in China (with all their genuine pollution) to avoid being arrested in connection with the UN's 'Oil for Food' program.  He is suspected of taking bribes during that period. 

More From John Izzard

Strong was the driving force behind the idea of world governance by the United Nations when he dreamt up a world tax on monetary transactions of 0.5% which would have given theUN an annual income of $1.5 trillion. About equal then to the income of the USA.  
The stumbling block was the Security Council, and their power of veto. He devised a plan to get rid of the Security Council but failed to get it implemented. Then came along the idea that global warming might just be the device to get his World Governance proposal up and running. 

Food for Oil
Investigations into the UN’s Oil-for-Food-Program found that Strong had endorsed a cheque for $988,885 made out to M. Strong — issued by a Jordanian bank. The man who gave the cheque, South Korean business man Tongsun Park was convicted in 2006 in a US Federal court of conspiring to bribe UN officials. Strong resigned and fled to Canada and thence to China where he has been living ever since. 

To speak ill of the dead is not nice but, here goes: Good riddance

Friday, 27 November 2015

The New Hockey Stick - Upside Down

What a terrible drawing.....Amateur.  But is it "Drawing the wrong conclusion?"

In this month's Quadrant, Steven Kates, under the subheading Myth vs Reality, writes "Global warming and Keynesian theory are natural bedmates...." 

His arguments re the comparisons of false diagrams is worth reading (see Quadrant -HERE) However, leaving

Tuesday, 17 November 2015

A Waste of Money at COP21

Cold Winds they blow over icy seas.
Don't look too much like no warmth to me.
A Waste of Money
A Waste called COP21.

Alarmists want to transform the West;

And so they try to do their best
To take our money.
Waste it at COP21.

Alarm will return again and again
They’ll come back for more money from you;
Because their
One aim is to transform Western economies.
So, they’ll want  money from you.

They want more cash at COP21 

COP21 more money
A waste of money.

Based on A Taste of Honey
Music by Bobby Scott
Original Words by Ric Marlow

Saturday, 14 November 2015

Unprecedented Arctic Sea Ice extent highest for date since at least 2004

Image: Steve Goddard from
Ocean and Ice Services | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut
DMI note:

Total sea ice extent on the northern hemisphere since 2005. The ice extent values are calculated from the ice type data from the Ocean and Sea Ice, Satellite Application Facility (OSISAF), where areas with ice concentration higher than 30% are classified as ice.
The total area of sea ice is the sum of First Year Ice (FYI), Multi Year Ice (MYI) and the area of ambiguous ice types, from the OSISAF ice type product. However, the total estimated ice area is underestimated due to unclassified coastal regions where mixed land/sea pixels confuse the applied ice type algorithm. The shown sea ice extent values are therefore recommended be used qualitatively in relation to ice extent values from other years shown in the figure. In late 2012 sea ice climatology and anomaly data will be available here. 

NSW State Government - Scientific Approach to SLR - Not IPCC Propaganda

The Australian Newspaper reports Planning Minister Rob Stokes will announce:
"what he says are world-first strategies that treat the 2007km NSW coast not as static fixed geography but as a constantly changing and evolving phenomenon."
In an interview with The Australian, Mr Stokes said he would be announcing
“a much more scientific and evidence-based ­approach … it reflects recognition that what is happening on the coast is a product of what is happening to the sand off the coast. We will be integrating coastal management and planning with what is happening in the adjacent seabed.”
Will PM Malcolm Turnbull and FM Julie Bishop take notice of this at Paris COP21?
Read More: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/climate/rob-stokes-announces-shake-up-of-council-coastal-management/story-e6frg6xf-1227606891066?sv=dd6b5054118b4a697a225c036ad155e 

Wednesday, 11 November 2015

The Weather Experiment



by IPCC Expert Reviewer Dr Vincent Gray

Dear Folks

I have just seen yet another climate survey 'Climate Models Part 1.'

He gives the series of scientific studies which established the current scientific study of the climate.

He shows that they have established:
  • Every property of the climate is instantly variable. The properties are so skewed that no average can be measured
  • A  forecast can cover ±2 degrees, with a bias of ±1 degree for only a few days

These properties have been established  by scientific methods.

The new models can only solve them by fraud.

They begin by assuming a model has a completely wrong number, even including a 29km radius. 
It can only be done by fraud.

Note to the Warmists:
Your people assume the thermal as some sense and make it worse by using the figures as constants when there is considerable uncertainties.      Also you treat a highly variable temperature sequence as statically valid. They even take  fractions of a degree.    
A statistical  uncertainty is  be considered  to be very  great but how is it derived there is talk of a constant. In addition the figures for the supposed balance are variable and the carbon dioxide, like all the atmospheric values, is variable but is shown by satellites to be varied.  
It is understandable that all of you are stuck into this mass. 

Every day they say that  horrible things are  likely.  Matt  Ridley has written a book about it.

One head of state has agreed with me: Vladimir Putin.

How many of the Warmists will admit that it is all a Scam and  not waste so  much  empty literature.

Vincent Gray

Monday, 9 November 2015

The Paris Climate Challenge

As COP21 approaches, the Counter-Conference has also been arranged:

In 2009 we laid down the Copenhagen Climate Challenge, when we asked UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon to answer 10 questions about climate. We’re back to ask the same and more questions, and challenge the climate ‘consensus’ in Paris at COP 21 with alternative climate hypotheses. If you have something to say in Paris, we still have places for a few more speakers. Take some time to navigate our pages, you can leave a comment if you’d like to say something in response to the articles backing up our 10 questions to Ban Ki-Moon below.

His Excellency Ban-Ki Moon,
Secretary-General, United Nations,
New York, NY.
United States of America
8 December 2009.
Dear Secretary-General,
Climate change science is in a period of ‘negative discovery’ – the more we learn about this exceptionally complex and rapidly evolving field the more we realize