We are a shoe-string operation. Unfortunately no BigOil funding! Help expose the hoax.

Westpac BSB 035612, Account No. 239469

All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

“Climate is and always has been variable. The only constant about climate is change; it changes continually.” ~Professor Tim Patterson

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf

Friday, October 31, 2014

Majority of Scientists Sceptical of Man made Global Warming

James Taylor for Forbes reports on a new  survey reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies.
Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists concerning global warming after all. 
Oh no! Not again. How many times do we have to rebut the false consensus; like here and here.

But wait, there's more.
Only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.
That's right, a strong majority believe that nature is the primary cause of global warming. The survey divides the responses into five groups; only one group expressed a strong belief that humans are the cause of global warming.
One interesting aspect of this new survey is the unmistakably alarmist bent of the survey takers. They frequently use terms such as “denier” to describe scientists who are skeptical of an asserted global warming crisis, and they refer to skeptical scientists as “speaking against climate science” rather than “speaking against asserted climate projections.” Accordingly, alarmists will have a hard time arguing the survey is biased or somehow connected to the ‘vast right-wing climate denial machine.’ 
Another interesting aspect of this new survey is that it reports on the beliefs of scientists themselves rather than bureaucrats who often publish alarmist statements without polling their member scientists. We now have meteorologists, geoscientists and engineers all reporting that they are skeptics of an asserted global warming crisis, yet the bureaucrats of these organizations frequently suck up to the media and suck up to government grant providers by trying to tell us the opposite of what their scientist members actually believe.

Read more at Forbes - HERE  -Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis

Thursday, October 30, 2014

NIWA Wrong in Making Temperature Warmer

By Anthony Cox

In 2012 Judgement was given in a case where the New Zealand equivalent of the Bureau of Meteorology, NIWA, was accused of adjusting temperature data to make the record warmer; the decision went against the litigants because the Judge said he had to believe the better scientific credentials of NIWA; see: http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=14122

Now a new paper has come out written by prominent scientists who have equal qualifications to the NIWA scientists which supports the case against NIWA for wrongly making temperature warmer: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/SC1410/S00086/new-paper-finds-no-significant-20th-century-warming-for-nz.htm (See footnote)

Just as in Australia with BOM we see NZ having its temperature record wrongly made warmer.

It’s a pity this new paper was not available to the litigants against NIWA.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

A Reanalysis of Long-Term Surface Air Temperature Trends in New Zealand * by C.R. de Freitas, M.O. Dedekind and B.E. Brill.
A research paper on the homogenisation of the temperature record in New Zealand, reducing the current official rate of 0.9°C per century to 0.3°C, has just been published in the international scientific journal Environmental Modeling and Assessment.

British Climate Change Act was a Profound Mistake

British Press Release:

It is now 6 years to the day since the House of Commons voted for the Climate Change Bill at Third Reading, by a majority of 465 to 5. The five of us have seen nothing in the intervening 6 years to change our view that the Climate Change Act was a profound mistake. It is time to bring to an end the pointless damage being inflicted on British households, British industry and the British economy by the unilateral commitment to unnecessarily expensive energy, and to suspend the Climate Change Act's unilateral targets until such time as a binding global agreement has been secured. -- Christopher Chope MP, 
- Phillip Davies MP, 
- Peter Lilley MP, 
- Andrew Tyrie MP, 
- Ann Widdecombe (MP 1987 - 2010), 28 October 2014

Britain faces a dark winter and Ann Widdicombe who has since left Parliament writes for the UK Express:

The climate change rebels were spot on

This week I returned to the House of Commons to join the other four for an anniversary dinner. Andrew Tyrie, Peter Lilley, Christopher Chope and Philip Davies are still there fighting the nonsense but I have simply joined the ranks of the long-suffering British public who view the increasing “lights will go out” stories with grim foreboding. 
Support for the then Labour Government’s bill was all part of Cameron’s campaign to “modernise” the Tory Party. It was the same campaign which saw him driving huskies and putting a ridiculous wind turbine on his roof so he was pretty displeased with the five of us but we were right. Oh, so right.
The wretched Bill committed us, at huge expense, to reduce the UK’s carbon emissions by a staggering 80 per cent
Ann Widdecombe
The wretched Bill committed us, at huge expense, to reduce the UK’s carbon emissions by a staggering 80 per cent. Yet that was supposed to be part of a global agreement and, as was easily foreseeable, there has been no such agreement but we have soldiered on despite accounting for about 2 per cent of all the world’s emissions. We have shunned the obvious answer of nuclear power in favour of vast, ugly, inefficient, bird-mashing wind farms which benefit none but those who take the subsidies from them. The phrase “political correctness gone mad” could have been invented for this stupidity alone. 

Monday, October 27, 2014

Windmill Disaster - Do we need RETS?

Wind Turbine Exploding.
Do you know how big those pieces are?
Why aren't the Greens supporting the environment?

Why do we keep finding things like

Have the "Greens" ever complained, ever protested about the killing of bats and birds?


Are the Greens  concerned about the detrimental harm to people caused by this inefficient form of energy creation?


Well, are the "Greens" and the other political parties who bow to idiotic "Green" ideology concerned about human health....bat and bird killings...


~ They have been confused by the stupid "Green" Ideology.

and wait - there is more:-

Windmills breaking up are dangerous! See this vid

Sunday, October 26, 2014

Activists and scientists debate climate change

Professor Don Easterbrook
An event at the Vancouver Community Library debating man made climate change occurred on Oct 23 with three sceptical scientist debating three alarmist activists.

Ryan Rittenhouse, a local activist; Daphne Wysham, a climate policy fellow at the Center for Sustainable Economy; and Kyle Dittmer, a hydrologist and meteorologist (correspondence course from the back of a cereal packet) with the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.

Three panelists will make the case against human-caused climate change: Don Easterbrook, a geology professor at Western Washington University; Nils Morner, a retired professor at Stockholm University; and Gordon Fulks, an astrophysicist.

The debate was organised by local activist Don Steinke and Vancouver City Council member (and Global Warming Realist) Bill Turlay. 

Dr Don Easterbrook at around 30 minutes in the video linked below presented 10 Facts about global warming.

He began by saying (as this blog has been saying for years) Global Warming is real so don’t call us climate deniers!

Proven Facts
  1. No global warming has occurred in the past 18 years - Increased global cooling has occurred over the past 10 years;
  2. Antarctic ice is increasing and has reached an all-time high;
  3. 85% of the past 10,000 years were warmer than present;
  4. CO2 is not capable of creating significant global warming;
  5. IPCC climate models have failed miserably (not even close);
  6. NOAA, NASA, HADLEY  tamper with data – no longer credible;
  7. Extreme weather events declining – lowest in 10 years;
  8. Five of the six snowiest winters on record have occurred since 2003;
  9. The rate of sea level rise is 7 inches per century;
  10. The oceans are alkaline, not acid, and will never be acid

Link to video made by Global Warming Realist Jim Karlock - Click Here

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Ocean Warming - Peer-reviewed paper retracted

From Retraction Watch:

Article using tin foil, cling wrap to debunk ocean warming retracted after urgent peer review

A conference proceedings paper that attempted to debunk ocean warming due to climate change using tin foil and cling wrap has been retracted by the Wessex Institute of Technology (WIT) Press. 
The paper, “A Comparison Of The Efficacy Of Greenhouse Gas Forcing And Solar Forcing,” was published as part of the proceedings of a July 2014 conference in Spain called Heat Transfer 2014. 
Here’s what author Robert (Bob) A. Irvine, about whom we haven’t been able to find information, claimed to have done in the paper:
Basically, two tubs of warm water, one under a clear cling wrap roof and one under a reflective foil roof, are allowed to cool. In test A they are both free to evaporate and both cool at the same rate. In test B evaporation is restricted by placing cling wrap on the surface of the water in both tubs. In test B the tub under the foil sky is significantly affected by downward long wave radiation and cools more slowly.
Read More at retraction Watch HERE

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Ex-Greenpeace Patrick Moore with Alan Jones

This blog has posted before why Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore left the movement after it was infiltrated by the Communists (LINK) and that he is visiting Australia (Tour Dates)

Enjoy his interview with Alan Jones: Alan Jones interviews Patrick Moore.