All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled. Dr David Deming

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:

Saturday, 2 October 2010

Warmists Terrorists bloody Video UPDATED

There is a depicable bloody video created by a mob called

The video shows Realists being blasted to bits by the fools who deny the science that shows that Co2 is not causing runaway global warming. Stories re this horrendous despicable video are here by James Delingpole, Anthony Watts "the most disgusting climate and carbon reduction video ever", Chris Horner "Just How Low Can Big Green Go?" and Paul Chesser "Blowing Up the Climate Skeptics"

See also related item on Drum Unleashed by Anthony Cox and Joanne Nova.

Killing climate realists is not a new theme...A public appeal has been issued by an influential U.S. website asking: “At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers.”

How could any sane person think that this video could help their cause - even a cause so warped as the AGW scam created to terrify people.

And who's behind this ghastly video, who's behind the 1010 mob of warming terrorists?

Well, William McKIbben of infamy, and, surprise, surprise, the (UK) Guardian; ActionAid (Govt of UK 2nd largest funder in 2009); The Carbon Trust (surely #1 on the list of quangos-to-go); The Energy Saving Trust.

Well, I hope that they are proud!


Paul Chesser tells us that William McKibben backs away from this stupid, awful video

"Commenter Susan made me aware in my earlier blog post that's Bill McKibben, a partner with, has issued a statement that claimed his group had nothing to do with their gross-out, kill-the-deniers video, and called it "disgusting." From his statement, which he issued after learning about the video after he (surprise!) climbed off a plane in Boston:

Climate skeptics are going to make a big deal of this. The video represents the kind of stupidity that really hurts our side, reinforcing in people's minds a series of preconceived notions, not the least of which is that we're out-of-control elitists. Not to mention crazy, and also with completely misplaced sense of humor....

UPDATE: See Tim Blair.

UPDATE: From Green Hell Blog.

Sony, Kyocera bail out of violent climate video outfit

October 4, 2010
Sony and Kyocera Mita are no longer listed as sponsors of the violence-advocating 10:10 climate group. (h/t Paul Chesser)


  1. Letter to the editor

    Dear Sir / Madam,
    I wish to protest at the video ad made in the UK and funded by the UK Govt and corporates (e.g. SONY) as grotesque and obscene.

    It shows children, workers and footballers not getting involved with reducing CO2 emissions by 10 % being blown into pieces with blood and bodies splattering.
    It has been quickly removed from the web because its was extremely shocking.

    See or

    The message is simple: if you are sceptical about CO2 effecting the planet - you should be destroyed.

    This is the brainwashing environmentalists are giving to our society and it shows how unbalanced their minds are.
    The video was supposed to be funny, but in effect it's sick.
    It follows another video that had a child threatening this generation if the adults dont start reducing CO2."

    We (The Climate Sceptics) are calling for a scientific debate and a royal commission into the cause of climate change. That issue has not been publicly resolved yet.
    We abhor the use of threats and innuendo that we who question the evidence and logic are being denigrated with.
    In reality it shows how extreme some of the climate alarmists are.
    As a commonsense logical person I`m challenging Bob Brown or Tim Flannery (or anyone in Australia who wants to defend reducing CO2 levels) to a debate on the cause of Climate change anytime, anywhere? Any takers?

    Leon Ashby
    President The Climate Sceptics

  2. From green wise by Louise Bateman

    Sony UK and Kyocera Mita, two corporate partners of the 10:10 campaign, both condemned the short film 'No Pressure’, directed by Richard Curtis, today, for being "tasteless" and "shocking".

    In a statement, today, Sony said it "strongly condemned the release" and that it was "disassociating itself" from the climate change campaign group for the time being as a result.

    "Sony considers [this film] to be ill-conceived and tasteless," the company said.

    Note that Sony is only disassociating itself FOR THE TIME BEING!

    Rawling Church, who was keen to point out that the Kyocera Mita had had no part in the film, or knowledge of it, said the company was now considering its sponsorship relationship with 10:10.


    After such a example of the tasteless stupidity of the 10:10 people, surely both these International Companies should immediately cut ties with 10:10.

    "Sony UK was one of the companies planning a series of carbon cutting activities..."
    No, Sony, cut your ties with this disgraceful organisation. Put that money instead into research - The Royal Society has expressed doubts over the hypothesis that CO2 causes warming, the science (See Vostok Ice Cores) shows that warming causes a rise in Atmospheric CO2.

  3. What a farce that global companies are supporting this bull about warming. But they are in it now to make a buck. As for their environmental credentials, any company shifting production to china shows their total lack of care for the environment.

  4. There is no science to support anthropogenic global warming.

    If there were, the IPCC would not be relying on an opinion that it is "very likely".

    At the time that this opinion was put out, we were told that the satellite instrument readings would enable a "hot spot" to be shown in the troposphere which would be the "signature" for AGW.

    IPCC did not tell us that there is no "hot spot" and no "signature". They did say they were trying to work out what could be wrong with the satellite instrument record in failing to show this.

    This is the greatest attempted fraud in history, and if it comes off, there will be undeserving billionaires created from trading in worthless "carbon credits".

    The unelected undemocratic parasite, the power hungry UN, will be one of the greatest beneficiaries, to the dtriment of the Western world.

  5. Time for a Royal Commission?

    With Gillard tottering and being pushed around like a toy, by her controller, the Greens, perhaps we need to take a much closer look at climate “science”. Thousands of scientists around the world are saying that the whole claim of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) is rubbish and that any temperature changes we have seen are the result of normal periodic fluctuations. A look at history confirms this.

    A Royal Commission should be constituted with all the powers necessary to compel answers, to inquire into all aspects of so called climate “science”. The Royal Commission should also have all powers necessary to enable cross examination, to elicit the truth.

    We have seen so much spin and doctored data in recent years that we owe it to ourselves to ensure that we have the facts right, before we embark on costly adventures such as an ETS, or a carbon tax. Both of these will cost us dearly and for what? Nowhere have I seen Gillard or the “lost-it-left” tell us what the target is. Will we reduce XX degrees C the world’s temperature? Surely it is good policy to have your goal set, before you embark on the greatest job killing exercise ever?

    There is plenty of evidence of questionable practices and statements, by so called climate scientists, all designed to procure a certain outcome and that is the promotion of CAGW. Reality is that the world is in a cooling phase. We have seen the promotion of myths such as: the disappearing polar bear myth; Himalayan glaciers gone by 2035 myth; ocean acidification myth; the sinking coral atolls myth; and, the increasing rotating storms (hurricanes, typhoons, cyclones) myth. There are plenty more!

    Further, there have been practices where data has been adjusted to give artificially increased temperature changes. The urban heat island effect has been ignored in small cities even though it has been shown to exist.

    Old temperature records have been adjusted lower to give the appearance of later increasing temperatures.

    Inconvenient records have been ignored to where there are only about 1,400 records used today, worldwide: Down from about 6,000 in 1990.

    There is much truth that needs to be uncovered, before we embark on Gillard’s economic and political death wish.

    A bit about windmills. All the promos tell you that they will power so may homes. Do they tell how many homes will be powered when the wind isn’t blowing? The answer is nil, nought, zero, zilch. But of course, if you are dedicated greenie you will be happy to do without power on a freezing cold winter’s morning. Greenies; enjoy your warm fuzzy feeling while shivering!


All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!