In a terrible piece where Stephan Lewandowsky, a Winthrop Professor tries to equate Climate Sceptics with Conspirator Theorists like Those that believe that 9/11 was a Bush/CIA plot.
Funnily some of his arguments can be used against the IPCC Alarmist Fraudsters.
Quote: "First, unlike the real insights provided by science and rational thought, conspiracy theories obsessively focus on selected pieces of — real or imaginary — "evidence" while ignoring mountains of actual data." Isn't this how Michael Mann created the disgraced "hockey-stick" graph? Wasn't this how the IPCC came out with the false statement that Himalayan Glaciers would all melt by 2035? So many other example from the Alarmists. DId Professor Lewandowsky look inwardly first?
Quote: "It is also of no relevance to climate "sceptics" that their claims about the absence of global warming are logically incoherent with their simultaneous claim that humans didn't cause the warming." Did the good Professor see the Phil Jones BBC interview where Jones said that the
rates of temperature rise in four period (1860-1880; 1910-40; 1975-1998 and 1975 to 2009) were similar. Note that two were before major industrialisation, two after. Warming for the four periods were (in degrees per decade) 0.163 ; 0.15 ; 0.166; 0.161, with cooling in between.
Quote: "Precisely the same fate awaits the conspiracy theory known as climate "scepticism". It will collapse under its own absurdity because as new scientific evidence amasses at a rapid pace, the presumed conspiracy must grow ever more grotesque and all-encompassing.."
To Paraphrase: Precisely the same fate awaits the conspiracy theory known as climate "alarmism". It will collapse under its own absurdity because as new scientific evidence amasses at a rapid pace, the theory of CO2 pollutionmust grow ever more grotesque and all-encompassing.