Tuesday, 15 November 2016

Brian Cox - Eat your words; Moon Landing People demand empirical evidence

Brian Cox, on his rude, massaged-data-evidence throwing appearance on QandA, asked Senator Roberts if he believed in the moon landing; then spluttered:

"The idea that NASA — I should say to people, by the way, the Australian Academy of Science have done a brilliant — you can never get any sense on programs like this (Q&A), they're adversarial, but the Australian Academy of Science report is superb. I've brought it because I'm going to come and give it to you in a minute for you to have a read. The accusation that NASA, the Australian, the Met Office in the UK, everybody is collaborating to manipulate global temperature data..." (source: ABC)
No, Brian, that was NASA:GISS. The real NASA astronauts, who engineered the moon lannding, have disputed the GISS "scientists."

49 Former NASA Scientists Send A Letter Disputing Climate Change


Some prominent voices at NASA are fed up with the agency’s activist stance toward climate change. The following letter asking the agency to move away from climate models and to limit its stance to what can be empirically proven, was sent by 49 former NASA scientists and astronauts. 
The letter criticises the Goddard Institute For Space Studies especially, where director Jim Hansen and climatologist Gavin Schmidt have been outspoken advocates for action. (Bold added) (source)
AND 100% of Scientists who walked on the Moon agree that man-made Global Warming is total bullshit.

Harrison Schmitt


H/t Jeff Grimshaw (Poster)


Energy & Environmental Newsletter - 14/11/16

From John Droz, jr.

The latest Energy and Environmental Newsletter, is now available online.


Some of the more interesting energy articles in this issue are:
Epstein's University Energy Talk and Q&A

Some of the more informative Global Warming articles in this issue are:



John Droz, jr.