Tuesday, 29 December 2015

Dr Tim Ball shows how "climate change" pushers skew data to get results they want


  • How The IPCC only look at human causes; and
  • How insignificant are those causes.

Only Human Causes


Most people don’t know that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) only considers human causes of global warming. 
This is critical because it is impossible to determine human causes if you don’t know or understand natural causes. It was done deliberately to ensure they could prove ”scientifically” the political message that human CO2 was causing disastrous global warming.

Insignificant CO2 

In fact, the natural variation in water vapor exceeds the possible effect of the human contribution of CO2 to any greenhouse effect. They include solar radiation (insolation), but that is not possible, humans do not alter the heat and light emitted by the Sun.
Tim has a great analogy to describe the contribution of human CO2.
The analogy I used years ago is that it is like saying my car is not running properly. To save time and money I am going to ignore the engine, the transmission, or the wheels, and concentrate on a nut on the right rear wheel (CO2). 
I am going to narrow it further by looking at one thread on the nut, which is the human portion of CO2.

A great piece. Read more at THEREBEL

Another great read from Tim Ball is his latest book

The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science

available from

or


Desperate Climate Alarmists Attack Skeptics

Larry Bell, in his latest column for Newsmax, under the above heading points out that although -

the climate hadn’t warmed over 19 years prior to the run-up to that conference, feverish rhetoric certainly did. Yale Professor Timothy Snyder’s September New York Times op-ed titled “The Next Genocide” compared those who doubted dangerous man-made climate change with a Nazi commander slaughtering a Jewish baby. 

Larry notes that a Democrat Senator attempted to launch a congressional witch hunt against climate alarm skeptics.

He requested that universities turn over documents about grants, congressional testimony and other activities involving seven dangerously doubting scientists who have testified at climate hearings. 
Larry talks of the RICO (“Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) letter, Jagdish Shukla, a professor of climate dynamics at George Mason University, and 19 other academics sent to POTUS Obama. Then he notes that Shukla's own organisation received $63 million since 2001  from taxpayers in the form of grants from the National Science Foundation, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and NASA.

What’s more, a huge amount of that generous IGES non-profit, tax-exempt largess went into Shukla family pockets. According to tax filings, together with his “business manager” and wife Anastasia and “assistant business manager/assistant to the president” daughter Sonia they drew $5.6 million in compensation since 2001 (not including Sonia’s unreported earnings). 

People Who live in Glass Houses

The sting in the tail from Larry:
Meanwhile, as satellites show no statistical warming for nearly two decades despite rising CO2 levels while overheated climate models have gone berserk, transparent agendas of glass house residents who attack alarm skeptics warrant reverse scrutiny. 

Read More at Newsmax (Link)


Day 5 - 29 December 2015