Monday, 11 May 2015

UN using climate change as a tool not an issue

Climate Models vs Observations.
Maurice Newman, who is the chairman of the Australian PM's Business Advisory Council, in a column for the Australian has written that the United Nations is using Climate Change as a tool and not an issue.
It’s a well-kept secret, but 95 per cent of the climate models we are told prove the link between human CO2 emissions and catastrophic global warming have been found, after nearly two decades of temperature stasis, to be in error
Mr Newman then details some outlandish predictions by the Shrill. After, he continues:
What’s more, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which we were instructed was the gold standard on global warming, has been exposed repeatedly for ­mis-representation and shoddy methods.  
Weather bureaus appear to have “homogenised” data to suit narratives. NASA’s claim that 2014 was the warmest year on record was revised, after challenge, to only 38 per cent probability. Extreme weather events, once blamed on global warming, no longer are, as their frequency and intensity decline. 
Why then, with such little evidence, does the UN insist the world spend hundreds of billions of dollars a year on futile climate change policies? Perhaps Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UN’s Framework on Climate Change has the answer? 
In Brussels last February she said, “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution.
In other words, the real agenda is concentrated political authority. Global warming is the hook. 
Actually, Maurice Strong is reported to have said something similar in 1992:
Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?
Although the hoax has been exposed, why will it not crawl away on its belly? Well, the Shrill have many accomplices. Mr Newman continues:

Having gained so much ground, eco-catastrophists won’t let up. After all, they have captured the UN and are extremely well funded. They have a hugely powerful ally in the White House. They have successfully enlisted compliant academics and an obedient and gullible mainstream media (the ABC and Fairfax in Australia) to push the scriptures regardless of evidence. 
They will continue to present the climate change movement as an independent, spontaneous consensus of concerned scientists, politicians and citizens who believe human activity is “extremely likely” to be the dominant cause of global warming. (“Extremely likely” is a scientific term?) 
And they will keep mobilising public opinion using fear and appeals to morality. UN support will be assured through promised wealth redistribution from the West, even though its anti-growth policy prescriptions will needlessly prolong poverty, hunger, sickness and illiteracy for the world’s poorest. 
And a warning to all delegates to the December COP21 conference in Paris:
There is a real chance Figueres and those who share her centralised power ambitions will succeed. As the UN’s December climate change conference in Paris approaches, Australia will be pressed to sign even more futile job-destroying climate change treaties. 
Resisting will be politically difficult. But resist we should. We are already paying an unnecessary social and economic price for empty gestures. Enough is enough.

December in Paris 

December is in Paris' low season and sees temperatures that range from freezing to around 40 degrees. This year, if the Al Gore Effect cuts in, there will be blizzards and the delegates will have to stay in the hotel, muttering @#^%ing Global Warming.

December in Paris (with apologies to Johnny Mercer.)

I never knew such freezing cold
But knew that CO2 has risen
I never knew my heart could cry
'cause of the flawed GW vision

De=cember in Paris, climate indecision
Flawed data tables up on the screen
December in Paris, climate derision
Australia's Foreign Minister announced that she will waste Australian Taxpayer's Money.

AUSTRALIA will contribute $200 million to a global fund to help poorer nations tackle climate change. 
If the temperature freezes under the Al Gore effect and India refused to sign any agreement, will Ms Bishop freeze the waste of Australian funds?