More Climate Alarmism Refuted

Source: Tallbloke


John Hinderaker writing for Power Line: (bold added)
It isn’t quite true to say that the science is settled–climate science is in its infancy, and we have only a poor understanding of the Earth’s climate. Just about every proposition is controversial. But we are very close to being able to say that, as to global warming alarmism, the debate is over and the alarmists have lost. (I mean, of course, the scientific debate, not the political one, which never had much to do with science in the first place.)
Read More: Power Line

= = = = = = = = = = =

ICSC Chief Tom Harris for the Washington Times:

Deceptive temperature record claims

Warmest month announcements have no scientific basis
The U.S. government is at it again, hyping meaningless records in a parameter that does not exist in order to frighten us about something that doesn’t matter. 
NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) announced this week that according to their calculations, July 2015 was the hottest month since instrumental records began in 1880. NOAA says that the record was set by eight one-hundredths of a degree Celsius over that set in July 1998. NASA calculates that July 2015 beat what they assert was the previous warmest month (July 2011) by two one-hundredths of a degree.  
As Jay Lehr, science director of the Chicago-based Heartland Institute said, “It is a scam that dwarfs all others that have come before.”
Read More Here

= = = = = = = = = = =

Judith Curry, writing on her blog Climate etc reviews a new paper by the UNSkeptical UNScience (SS) team.

The paper:

  • Rasmus E. Benestad, 
  • Dana Nuccitelli, 
  • Stephan Lewandowsky,
  • Katharine Hayhoe
  • Hans Olav Hygen
  • Rob van Dorland
  • John Cook     
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
Judith Curry writes "The conceits of consensus": (bold added)
RealClimate has an entertaining post on the paper, Let’s learn from mistakes, where we learn that this paper was rejected by five journals before being published by Theoretical and Applied Climatology.  I guess the real lesson from this paper is that you can get any kind of twaddle published, if you keep trying and submit it to different journals.
Read More at Climate Etc


  1. AGW was founded in Politics from the "beginning" in the 1992 Rio Earth Conference. AGW is the foundation to be used as an excuse to implement the UN's Agenda 21 plan for sustainability in the 21st Century. The logic in 1992 was to reduce the population of the planet by destroying capitalism. Countries would voluntarily destroy their industrial complex to save the planet. Besides Agenda 21, the Biodiversity Convention. These documents define a one world socialist government run by un-elected, unaccountable UN bureaucrats. In this Utopian world there will be no property rights, no single family dwellings, the entire civilian world would be disarmed. In fact, the UN is advertising in the New York area for a firearms confiscation officer. When the guns are confiscated it will be all over. 260 million people have been killed by their own governments in the 20th century all preceded by gun confiscation. UN urban assault vehicles have been spotted in large numbers throughout the USA. Some believe the confiscation could begin after the Jade Helm military exercise in the Southwest US . As I have long contended, the science is a diversion to take us off the real issues. All these documents are available on the UN website. They are hiding there in plain sight.


Post a Comment

All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!