Wednesday, 24 June 2015

Green Climate Fraud

Douglas Casey, a classmate of Bill Clinton at Georgetown University, has been quoted as saying:
Foreign aid might be defined as a transfer of money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries. (link)
The supposed aim of the shrill in pushing the catastrophic climate change (CAGW) hoax is to transfer money from rich countries to poor countries via the Green Climate Fund:
The Fund will contribute to the achievement of the ultimate objective of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). In the context of sustainable development, the Fund will promote the paradigm shift towards low-emission and climate-resilient development pathways by providing support to developing countries to limit or reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and to adapt to the impacts of climate change, taking into account the needs of those developing countries particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change. The Fund will be guided by the principles and provisions of the Convention.
Many countries have indicated that they are on board with the fraud:

  •  President Obama announced on Saturday that the United States will contribute $3 billion to a new international fund intended to help the world’s poorest countries address the effects of climate change. (link)
  • The (Australian) Federal Government has announced it will contribute $200 million to an international fund designed to help developing nations tackle climate change. Foreign Minister Julie Bishop announced the funding at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Lima, Peru. (link) (Source)

The recent Bonn climate talks, however, were a failure: (link)
The latest round of UN climate talks have made slow progress on refining a negotiating text for the Paris summit in December, the focal point for efforts to agree curbs on greenhouse gas emissions in developed and developing countries. 
Despite two weeks of talks at an interim meeting in the German city of Bonn, most of the contradictory proposals that littered the previous 90-page document remain, meaning that the next few rounds of talks in August and October will have to shoulder the burden of distilling a negotiating text by December.
 And what of the evil carbon (dioxide). Make no mistake they mean carbon dioxide even though they use the deceptive - carbon. To do this is the same as calling water (H2O)  - oxygen. Anyone for a glass of oxygen?


There is no evidence that CO2 is causing runaway global warming. There is no correlation between global temperature and atmospheric CO2. In fact, atmospheric CO2 keeps rising yet there has been no warming of the atmosphere for ~20 years.

No comments:

Post a comment

All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!