Thursday, 3 May 2012

To be - or not to be - a Denier.

Alarmist looking for the "climate" truth.
I have had a recent exchange with some-one whom I call a real denier. I said that I believed in climate change and that climate had always changed and this real denier said that climate had not changed until man started emitting fossil fuel emission.

In my opinion, this real denier is the true denier. (Or perhaps a fossil fool!)

I believe that we have to turn the term DENIER (not the stocking measurement) around and put it on the Alarmists.

Piers Akerman did it in his piece entitled  Truth sends icy chill up scaremongering spines
However, any informed school student not totally brainwashed by the Green movement would know that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant and that it is, in fact, essential for plant life, which in turn supports animal and insect life on this planet.
The carbon dioxide which the Gillard government is going to tax from July 1 is therefore essential for all life.
In insisting CO2 is a pollutant, Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Climate Minister Greg Combet reveal themselves as deniers.

When Jonathan Overpeck said to Oklahoma University's Dr David Deming, before MBH98 (ie before the fraudulent hockeystick) that, to scare the pants off the populace, they had to get rid of the Medieval Warming, that showed the true intention of the Alarmists.

Lie and scare - don't worry about the science.

Lie about anything to get the message across.

So, whenever they present the disgraced "hockey stick graph,"  they are denying (or pretending to deny) the scientific reality of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) and the Little Ice Age (LIA).

So, really, who are the deniers?

When Al Gore, in his fraudulent movie - "An Inconvenient Truth" (actually at least nine inconvenient untruths) presents the Ice core graphs and  yet presents them so that they are not shown together -  one is above the other - he is not showing the truth. He is pretending that the rise in atmospheric CO2 forces a rise in temperature.

Scientists agree that temperatures rise BEFORE the rise in atmospheric CO2 with a lag of 800 years or so..

Gore must have know that the reverse was true but he DENIED the truth.

Our mission, should we accept it (and we must), is to show the world that the Alarmists are the TRUE deniers.

In the meantime, we should always be suspicious of what is presented to us.

Or, to rephrase, we should always be sceptical of what is presented to us.

Scepticism is a good, positive, scientific, reasonable quality.

Alarmism is a bad, negative, unscientific, unreasonable quality.

The NO CARBON TAX climate sceptics are proud to be sceptics and are glad that we present the truth - not the fraudulent science of the true DENIERS - the ClimateGate CRU, the IPCC, The CSIRO, The BoM, The Green Gillard Government and the other Alarmists.

(K')Nearly getting the carbon dioxide tax right.

Kristina Keneally and Power
Kristina Keneally is a failed NSW Labor premier. Anna Bligh is a failed Queensland Premier. When Bligh lost the election in an humiliating electoral defeat,  and although promising that she would stay in parliament, no matter what, the day after the election Bligh resigned. Kristina Keneally, on the other hand,  after she lost power, fulfilled her promise and stayed in parliament.

Good on you, Kristina!

Kristina advised the Green Gillard Government to dump the toxic carbon dioxide tax, the tax arising from a broken promise, the tax that will cripple Australia's economy.
A Newspoll in The Australian yesterday saw Labor's primary vote drop two points over the last fortnight to 27 per cent, while the Coalition's primary vote has climbed three points to 51 per cent.
Ms Keneally......... said Ms Gillard needed a “game changer” if her government was to have any chance at the next election.  “She really has to deal with the question of what she's going to do about this carbon tax,” Ms Keneally told Sky News.
The warmist leaning Climate Spectator reports:
The ALP knows it is dead in the water and is now trying to save the furniture. Claims that the climate legislation is toxic for the government led to suggestions from advisers either to weaken the legislation, or to abandon the issue in public discourse.
The only position now left to the government after July 1 is to say that tax compensation will make most families ‘no worse off’ with carbon pricing. But being ‘no worse off’ is not a compelling reason to introduce disruptive legislation, or to do anything.
However, if the tax increase causes some businesses to fold, larger business to relocate offshore and mine output buyers to seek cheaper product elsewhere, we all will be worse off.

Andrew Bolt has similar advice:
LABOR will not want to listen to advice given by a nasty conservative, not even when I now tell it of its one last hope.
It's simple.
Get a new leader - probably Kevin Rudd, with Workplace Minister Bill Shorten as deputy.
What's more, promise the carbon tax will not come in until voters have voted for it at an election.
And not before 2016 at the earliest.
Only a move this big will prove to voters that Labor has got it.
It knows that it cheated voters, and must win back their faith, whatever the pain.
Business Spectator reports thaGillard has been given June deadline to reverse Labor fortunes.
Labor MPs have given Prime Minister Julia Gillard a deadline of the end of June ― intended to be enough time to sell the May 8 budget ― to boost Labor's political fortunes or else risk losing her leadership of the party, according to a report by The Australian Financial Review.
The loss of support this week from the 17 members who from the NSW Right faction has struck a particularly hard blow for Ms Gillard. The end of June coincides with the final week of the June parliamentary sittings.

Labor's last hope is the cancellation of the tax on carbon dioxide and the keeping of MS Gillard's promise that "there will be no carbon tax under a government I lead."