| Gleick (right) recoils from the Spear of Truth|
Image from James Delingpole.
Warmists confirmed as cheats, liars, fakers
I wonder how the BBC environment correspondent Richard Black would report it if the Climatic Research Unit's Phil Jones were suddenly to confess that everything he'd said in the last two decades about the anthropogenic warming threat was total rubbish. I'm guessing something like: "Hero climate scientist announces glorious discovery: world saved, research at CRU now shows!"I wonder how the ABC would report it, if Tim Flannery were suddenly to confess that everything he'd said in the last two decades about the anthropogenic warming threat was total rubbish and that his trivial tome The Weather Makers was a work of fiction.
I wonder how the New York Times, or the Guardian environment pages or Huffington Post would report it if NASA's James Hansen were to burst in with a machine gun and grenades at the next Heartland climate sceptics' conference and wipe out half the delegates. "NASA expert helps solve global overpopulation problem!", probably.
If you think I'm joking consider how all the above-mentioned organs responded to the story of Fakegate, in which climate activist Peter Gleick engaged in identity theft and used a forged document in order to smear the Heartland institute with a pack of lies. The way they covered it, you'd think the real villain of the piece was not Gleick but Heartland. One liberal commentator went so far as to suggest that the person who had faked the one (and only) incriminating document was none other than Heartland's president Joe Bast. Some kind of sinister, false-flag operation to make the environmental movement look bad, I suppose. (Yeah, like it needs any help on that score).
Would Tony Jones call a special Q&A with Bob Carter, Ian Plimer and Stewart Franks if the Bureau of Meteorology suddenly admitted that they had been falsifying the data for years.