Tuesday, 17 May 2011

The Galileo Movement, Alan Jones and Richard Lindzen

Case Smit (above) John Smeed (below)
Australia has many bodies trying to expose the AGW hoax; trying to get the real "science" to the people.
There is, of course, us i.e. The Climate Sceptics Party, and the Tea (Taxed Enough Already) Party; there is Viv Forbes' Carbon Sense Coalition; Ray Evans and the Lavoisier Group; the Australian Environment Foundation; among others and then there are the bloggers who are contributing to the enlightenment of the science including Joanne Nova; Malcolm Roberts; Jennifer Marohasy; Australian Climate Madness
and the few marvelous columnists in the MSM who look outside the circle, who investigate instead of republishing party handouts -

Foremost is Andrew Bolt and then (in alphabetical order) Akerman (at sea), Albrechtsen, Blair, Devine etc and the amazing cartoonist Zeg.

So, do we need another body?

Introducing the Galileo Movement. The Galileo movement has been formed by two amazing men. This daring pair of retired engineers risked their own money to promote the last Australian tour for Lord Christopher Monckton.

(We are trying to raise money for another tour by Christopher (See Lord Monckton Tour)

Now, they have set up The Galileo Movement.

Our objective is to expose misrepresentations pushing a 'price on carbon dioxide'.

We care about freedom, security, the environment, humanity and our future.

 Alan Jones launched the Galilieo movement on his 2GB Breakfast show by talking to the foremost "climate" scientist - Richard Lindzen.  HERE.
Alan then talked to the movement's project director, Malcolm Roberts. HERE. 
To get the other side, Alan spoke to David Karoly HERE.
Next Alan Spoke to Dr Tim Ball - see post HERE


  1. You people are out of touch with reality. No one will take this seriously. Lord Monckton is a serial scientific fraud. He takes scientific reports and twists the conclusions. His fraud has been debunked on many occasions.

    Here is the latest news from the National Research Council of the US National Academies of Science, in an advice to the US Congress (truncated due to space restrictions):

    "News from the National Academies

    Date: May 12, 2011



    WASHINGTON — Warning that the risk of dangerous climate change impacts is growing with every ton of greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere, a National Research Council committee today reiterated the pressing need for substantial action to limit the magnitude of climate change and to prepare to adapt to its impacts. The nation's options for responding to the risks posed by climate change are analyzed in a new report and the final volume in America's Climate Choices, a series of studies requested by Congress. The committee that authored the report included not only renowned scientists and engineers but also economists, business leaders, an ex-governor, a former congressman, and other policy experts.

    "The goal of the America's Climate Choices studies is to ensure that climate decisions are informed by the best possible scientific knowledge, analysis, and advice, both now and in the future," said committee chair Albert Carnesale, chancellor emeritus and professor, University of California, Los Angeles.

    The new report reaffirms that the preponderance of scientific evidence points to human activities -- especially the release of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere -- as the most likely cause for most of the global warming that has occurred over the last several decades. This trend cannot be explained by natural factors such as internal climate variability or changes in incoming energy from the sun. The report adds that the impacts of climate change on human and natural systems can generally be expected to intensify with warming.

    While it recognized that climate change is inherently a global issue requiring an international response, the committee focused on the charge from Congress to identify steps and strategies that U.S. decision makers could adopt now. A coordinated national response to climate change, which the country currently lacks, is needed and should be guided by an iterative risk management framework in which actions taken can be revised as new knowledge is gained.

    "America's response to climate change is ultimately about making choices in the face of risk," noted committee vice chair William L. Chameides, dean of the Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, N.C. "Risk management strategies must be durable enough to promote sustained progress yet sufficiently flexible to take advantage of new knowledge and technologies."

    Substantial reductions of greenhouse gas emissions should be among the highest priorities in the national response, the committee said. Although the exact magnitude and speed of reductions will depend on how much risk society deems acceptable, it would be imprudent to delay taking action. The committee cited many reasons for not waiting, including that the faster emissions are reduced, the lower the risks. And because the effects of greenhouse gases can take decades to manifest and then persist for hundreds or even thousands of years, waiting for impacts to occur before taking action will likely be too late for meaningful mitigation. Beginning emissions reductions soon will also lower the pressure to make steeper and costlier cuts later. "It is our judgment that the most effective strategy is to begin ramping down emissions as soon as possible," Carnesale said.“

    The rest is at:


    Steve Phillips

  2. Anonymous says: “The new report reaffirms that the preponderance of scientific evidence points to human activities -- especially the release of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere -- as the most likely cause for most of the global warming that has occurred over the last several decades.”

    This wrong; outside of models there is no evidence to support such a misleading statement.

  3. The people who believe in ' so called 'Climate change' have been obviously brain washed. There are many prominent Professor's who deny that man is contributing enough 'Carbon' to cause Global warming. When the so called experts changed the name from 'Global warming' to Climate Change the public should have know something was wrong. In 1974 there was some Professor's who predicted an Ice Age for the 90's. That was a myth and so is Global warming or Climate Change.

  4. How many years will it be before sea level rise consumes the first meter? That is the question. How long do we have to move that critical infrastructure. Fifty years most likely.

    History will judge us as fiddling around with senseless debate. Your children will judge you, in fact.

    Look around. What will be lost in that first meter of rise?

  5. Anonymous asks: "How many years will it be before sea level rise consumes the first meter?"

    Sea Level -A paper published in Global and Planetary Change by Cazenave et al entitled, ‘Sea level budget over 2003–2008: A reevaluation from GRACE space gravimetry, satellite altimetry and Argo’ suggests that the raw satellite data shows no increase in sea level at all!

    http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/army-corps-of-engineers-sea-level-rise-rates-have-slowed/ also seems to confirm no rise.

    http://www.thegwpf.org/science-news/2784-sea-level-rise-still-slowing-down.html -By now, this should come as no surprise—the rate of sea level rise continues to slow. The rate during the most recent 10-yr period is 2.32 mm/yr (or about 9 inches per century).

    So, at 2.32mm/yr or 232mm/century, anonymous, that 1 metre rise will take at least four centuries.

    You say: "Your children will judge you, in fact."
    At four generations per century, the judgment MAY be made by your childrens' childrens'childrens' childrens' childrens' childrens' childrens' childrens' childrens' childrens' childrens' childrens give or take a generation...

  6. I think it is great that you let the brainwashed left post here. When ever I try and post links to studies debunking AGW, the left deletes my post. Censored comments and blogs.

    Keep up the good work, the left wants to make slaves of us!

  7. Im a regular person with no over the top scholastic prizes BUT i have enough commonsense to understand that mother nature has and always will look after her own.Over millenea tides and moon cycles have changed and will do so again and again.We have had ice ages and stone ages and iron ages,like everthing on our wonderful planet it changes and still goes round and round.This is just a rip off by our Gov't to try and refill it's coffers after a ridiculous amount of finacial waste has left us sooo broke.Wake up people.

  8. I was neutral on climate change and a carbon tax until I saw the Gallileo Movement sponsor Monckton speak at North Sydney leagues the other night.

    The talk was introduced with the MC leading the crowd in a chant to "Ditch the Bitch" (re; Julia Gillard) and entreating the audience to hiss every time the ABC was mentioned (almost fair if Adam Spencer's disappointing diatribe is to be used to judge Australia's best institution).

    What followed was only slightly better... ie a pseudo scientific selective evidence whitewash. I may have misheard but I think we were actually being told that carbon dioxide doesn't result in infrared radiation being captured... ie. not only Climate Change denial but actual denial of the Greenhouse effect. OMG.

    Thankyou to both Monckton and the Gallileo Movement for providing a reference point. I am charging away from wherever and whatever you bunch of freaks stand for.

  9. Dave,

    Your attention to details and lack of understanding shows that your diatribe is ill-founded.
    Galileo did not sponsor the LM tour, it was The Climate Sceptics party;
    No where did anyone deny climate changes, therefore your use of climate change denial is erroneous;
    the MC didn't say hiss when the abc was mention, it was Lord Monckton;
    ABC Australia'best institution? The ABC themselves have admitted that they do not follow their charter but push the falsified AGW theory;

    Charge away in your ignorance, Dave.

  10. why don't you start the sun revoling around the Earth hypothisis that Galileo had to counter your the antithisis of Galileo we require climate action now

  11. What a garbled anonymous comment.

    "why don't you start the sun revoling around the Earth hypothisis" revoling?? hypothisis??
    Try - Why don't you start the sun revolving around the Earth hypothesis...

    "Galileo had to counter your the antithisis of Galileo we require climate action now"

    I give up! What does this mean? Unclear from you terrible use of the English language.

  12. You've got some hide, commandeering the good name and reputation of Galileo for your disingenuous little propaganda cell.
    And Alan Jones as patron? Galileo would never condone the disgraceful calumny we hear from Mr Jones every day.

  13. Thank GOD for you wonderful Patriots, I live in fear that any day now the zealous warmist leftist Islamofascist GREENIES will turn up on my doorstep to eat my children and boil my bunny rabbits, but knowing you guys are out there fighting the GOOD TRUE and RIGHT fight allows me to sleep safe in my bed. Amen. And thank you for all that you do.


  14. Reasons for carbon tax, and other bad policies of Labor Party, and to some extend Liberal Party, are NOT for what is presented to public, nor is result of INCOMPETENCE of politicians involved.
    Labor, Liberals, Greenies and others, are educated in the same schools, by the same lecturers, and with the same purpose: HOW TO RULE PEOPLE(MASSES). They are studying metods and mistakes of the past rulers, from Pharaons, Romans,Vikings...ETC. to contemporaries, Napoleon, Hitler, Lenin, Stalin...ETC.

    Romans had famous tactic: "DIVIDE ET IMPERA" (DIVIDE AND REIGN).
    Today politicians, all arround the Western World MODIFIED Romanian tactic by adding "DIVIDE,ENPOVERISH AND REIGN".

    Proof: DIVIDE_- IMMIGRATION policies. Encouraging so called "ASYLUM SEEKERS" of vastly different religion, custom,languige, traditions etc, to come in Western Countries, to BLUNT any possible uprising of masses against rulers.

    ENPOVERISH - Introducing vast array of useless taxes, and spendings, as Carbon Tax, Pink butts, and countless others to DESTROY employement, and by that ENPOVERISH people, making people dependent on governements and welfare. When LENIN seized power in RUSSIA 1918, and
    other communist leaders after 1945 in EASTERN EUROPE, first thing they did was: DESTROY independent people as BUSSINEs people, FARMERS, MERCHANTS,INTELIGENTIA, and ALL INDEPENDENT forms( Economicaly or Intelectualy) and made them EXISTENTIONALLY DEPENDENT of governement. Politicians are enpovereshing people, preparing them for dependancy on governements, and consequently,create ONE WORLD governement, with bilions of dependant SLAVES, all arround the world. No armies will be necessary, but police forces and secret agencies will be highly present, to keep slaves in slavery. Do not believe that politicians introduced carbon tax believing that carbon DIOXIDE is warmi9ng the planet. Far from that. they know, same as any normal person knows, that
    carbon tax will not stop warming of the planet, if planet is warming AT ALL.(?). They have all available informations same as "SCEPTICS", about planet conditions. Do NOT underestimate their inteligence. They are very inteligent and highly educated people. THE PROBLEM IS, that they are using their abilities to create new slavery, and consequently DEMISE of HUMAN KIND.

    A philosopher once concluded: "THE HIGHEST ACHIVEMENT OF DEVIL IS,

  15. carbon dioxide traps heat.
    there is more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
    the atmosphere will have more heat in it.

    1. Obviously you are not aware of ALL the science, Anonymous. The Logarithmic Effect of Carbon Dioxide shows that CO2 traps less and less heat.



All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!