Do Scientist on the Public Purse Cheat?

Let's look at the start of the Global Warming Scare.


The fraud had its beginning in the Club of Rome and senior member Maurice Strong who said in the opening speech to the Rio Earth Summit 1992:

What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group's conclusion is 'no'. The rich countries won't do it. They won't change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?( Source Wikiquotes)


As revealed by the now-deleted First Global Revolution Report of the Club of Rome, they chose the threat of global warming as the common enemy against which they could unite.

Strong set up the bureaucratic structure to control the political and science agendas.

Then they set science on its head by defining climate change as: (link)
 a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over considerable time periods.
Concentrate on Human causes, ignore natural causes.

Reads more in Tim Ball’s The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science

Carrying on the Fraud:

Since that notorious beginning, the frauding has continued; eg


i)               Mike’s Nature Trick;
ii)             Hide the Decline

Historically, alcohol thermometers were used to measure minimum
temperatures and mercury thermometers were used to measure
maximum temperatures – across Australia.
Then on 1 November 1996, the Bureau changed their
‘primary instrument’ to electronic sensors.
And, down-under, as exposed by Jennifer Marohasy and others


Cartoons by Josh
Many more examples of the public scientists homogenising (ie manipulating or frauding) the data are available including


A sorry story; unfortunately destroying the public’s trust in science.










Comments