I often wonder how the Alarmists can still cling to their belief in "Global Warming" -aka Anthropogenic Climate Change, the falsified AGW hypothesis. (Link and Link)
They made a poster-child of the Polar Bear, screaming that the Polar Bear populations were declining, meanwhile experts studying polar bears like
And then there is snow. The latest snow job from the Alarmists.
And yet, on 29/12/2017, we saw this headline:
They made a poster-child of the Polar Bear, screaming that the Polar Bear populations were declining, meanwhile experts studying polar bears like
- Mitch Taylor, who, after telling the truth was booted from the Polar Bear Specialist Group meeting in Copenhagen; and
- Susan Crockford who revealed the truth that numbers were increasing greatly.
And then there is snow. The latest snow job from the Alarmists.
![]() |
Heavy snow was lying across Scotland, Northern Ireland and parts of England |
Senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia -David Viner – March 2000
![]() |
WUWT 2009 |
“Within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting event"”.“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is."
And yet, on 29/12/2017, we saw this headline:
Britain braced for heavy snow amid warning of 'nasty' travel conditions
So how did the alarmists reconcile the no snow/more snow conflict in their religion?
As usual, brushed off their old proclamations and created a new orthodoxy. Michael Mann, that's right, he of the fraudulent "Hockey Stick Graph," opined:
Gee, who do they think they are fooling? Do they think the public is stupid?
Do they think that we cannot distinguish between
And, as an aside, how do the alarmists explain the poor plight of frozen iguanas falling from trees?
Come on, both §you deluded followers and §you evil pushers of the fraud, come clean. Apologise for your pushing the fraud.
But no! There is too many $$$$$$ invested in the fraud.
As usual, brushed off their old proclamations and created a new orthodoxy. Michael Mann, that's right, he of the fraudulent "Hockey Stick Graph," opined:
There are various ways in which climate change can make weather more extreme. Some of them are fairly obvious - if you warm up the planet, you're going to have more frequent and intense heatwaves. Warmer planet, you're going to have more extremely hot days. You tend to see more flooding events, because a warmer atmosphere can hold more moisture, so when it does rain or snow, you actually get more precipitation. The rain and snow falls in larger amounts, and that's something we've seen as well in recent years.
YEP! The rain and snow falls in larger amounts, and that's something we've seen as well in recent years.
Do they think that we cannot distinguish between
"The rain and snow falls in larger amounts, and that's something we've seen as well in recent years;"and
“Within a few years winter snowfall will become a very rare and exciting event”.“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is."
And, as an aside, how do the alarmists explain the poor plight of frozen iguanas falling from trees?
Come on, both §you deluded followers and §you evil pushers of the fraud, come clean. Apologise for your pushing the fraud.
But no! There is too many $$$$$$ invested in the fraud.
Comments
Post a Comment
All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!