Problems with "massaging" the true data: True science goes out the window.

When the Alarmists the data, they should be sure that other reactions correspond.

Take the 1940's blip.

Those emails show that the Alarmists wanted to de-blip the 1940s blip. It was an inconvenient truth.

And why did they want to get rid of the blip?

Because it was a warm period when they wanted to massage temperatures down to push the man-
made global warming hoax.

And so, they dramatically cooled the past.

Let's examine the news.

IN September 1910, almost all the world's glaciers were reported as retreating; by 1922, many glaciers reported as having disappeared. (Have the Alarmists and the Main Steam Media advises you of this?)

In 1940, news reports were that the Arctic was rapidly melting and Greenland's glaciers were receding.

In the fifties, it was predicted that Norwegian and Alaskan Glaciers were fast disappearing.

There was a prediction for an ice-free arctic in the late fifties.


However, by the sixties, the glaciers were growing:

Now, does any of that correlate with the comical garbage pushed by the Alarmist scientists?

But here is the ringer.

Science (true science) says
  • Cooling = Glaciers Growing
  • Warming = Glaciers Melting

Isn't that elementary science?

So the data before the massaging showed (in accordance with above)

But, after the cheating flew out the window.  When the temperatures were rising, the glaciers and Arctic were growing but when the (massaged) temperatures were falling, the glaciers and the Arctic were rapidly melting.

Why hasn't the MSM and even Australia's chief scientists addressed these scientific quandaries?

H/t Tony Heller