All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled. Dr David Deming

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf

Thursday, 1 September 2016

The so-called global warming “scientific consensus” is a complete fabrication and does not exist

Canadian Free Press' Fred Dardick reports:

The so-called global warming “scientific consensus” is a complete fabrication and does not exist

Nature Magazine, the academic journal that introduced the world to X-rays, DNA double helix, wave nature of particles, pulsars, and more recently the human genome, is set to publish a paper in June that shows atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is responsible for only 5-10% of observed warming on Earth. 

As explained by the paper’s author Professor Jyrki Kauppinen, “The climate is warming, yes, but not because of greenhouse gases."
 
For the preeminent scientific journal in the world to publish Kauppinen’s work shows
conclusively that Al Gore’s much touted “scientific consensus” supporting human-caused global warming is a myth.
The America Physical Society reviews its Statement on Climate Change every 5 years: the last statement was released in 2012. The APS board supports the alarmist position. An e-mail circulated by American Emeritus Professor of Physics Hal Lewis, APS Fellow Roger Cohen, and Councillor
Robert Austin found that at least 37% of replies did not support the statement. Subsequently Hal Lewis, after being a member for 67 years, resigned his membership of APS.

PhysicsWorld reported (Oct14, 2010):
 Lewis writes that climate change is "the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist," and that the APS has "accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it." He adds that Princeton University physics department, of which Callan is chair, "would lose millions a year if the global warming bubble burst." (bold added)
Lewis is also one of the 160 physicists who last year failed to persuade the society to modify its "appallingly tendentious" formal statement on climate change, which it had released in November 2007, to reflect their own doubts about the human contribution to global warming. "Everything that has been done in the last year has been designed to silence debate." Lewis writes in his letter to Callan. "APS management has gamed the problem from the beginning, to suppress serious conversation about the merits of the climate change claims." In resigning, Lewis says the APS "no longer represents me". 

Nobel laureate Prof Ivar Giaever resigns in protest
Prof Ivar Giaever has resigned from the American Physical Society, where his peers had elected him a fellow to honour his work. 
The society, which has 48,000 members, has adopted a policy statement which states: "The evidence is incontrovertible: global warming is occurring." 
But Prof Giaever, who shared the 1973 Nobel award for physics, told The Sunday Telegraph. "Incontrovertible is not a scientific word. Nothing is incontrovertible in science."  (see also: AAAS Fellow pillories Political Agenda of AAAS Board.)
The Canadian Free Press article continues:
Since 2009 more than 238 physicists including Nobel Prize winner Ivar Giaever and professors from Harvard, MIT, Princeton, UCLA and dozens of other top universities and research institutions have signed an open letter addressed to the Council of the American Physical Society saying the scientific data did not support the conclusion that increased CO2 concentrations are responsible for global warming. 
In 2009 over 700 international scientists, including many current and former UN IPCC members, joined with Senator Inhofe in a Senate Minority Report to express their doubts over man-made global warming claims. 
In the report U.S. Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg was quoted as saying “It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” 
In the largest effort to date to document global warming dissent in the scientific community, 31,486 Americans with university degrees in science - including 9,029 PhD, 7,157 MS, 2,586 MD and DVM, and 12,714 BS or equivalent - have signed on with the Global Warming Petition Project to state “the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity.” 
AND Fred Dardick concludes: (bold added)
Many of the best and brightest minds in the United States and around the world are in total agreement: The so-called global warming “scientific consensus” is a complete fabrication and does not exist.





5 comments:

  1. Nice Post Geoff - Thanks for publishing it here.
    I hope Unknown and his/her brainwashed lefty, alarmist friends read this one too...
    Like any other time any ardent and hopelessly indoctrinated greenie attempts to debunk something a skeptic says about the CAGW / CC scam: I could almost smell his/her anger and FEAR between the lines of the stupid comment he/she left under the post about Viv Forbes and Clexit yesterday...

    Greenie CAGW believers and moronic alarmists DESPISE the truth and I love laughing at them whenever they show it. :D
    LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The 97% consensus is a testament to the "repeat it enough and people will believe it" approach to science.

    .....perfected by big pharma a couple decades back.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Global Warming Petition Project (aka the Oregon Petition) signatures represent one quarter of one percent (0.25%) of the people that the Project alleges are qualified to have an opinion, and less than one half of one percent (0.44%) of the people working in the supposedly climate-related fields in 2013. And the GWPP's criteria are so loose that a stay-at-home parent with a veterinary degree who has never read a single climate study or worked a single day as a scientist is considered equal to a professional climatologist. That's hardly the counter-consensus you think it is. (http://scholarsandrogues.com/tag/gwpp-bls-doed2015/)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Poor deluded Brian Angliss. Your scholars and Rogues site is at least half honest. They are definitely 'rogues."

    They aren't scholars as is shown by errors in the first few lines:

    "the climate change-denying Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (OISM)..."

    If you had checked, you would have read:
    "The Petition Project is financed by non-tax deductible donations to the Petition Project from private individuals, many of whom are signers of the petition. The project has no financing whatever from industrial sources. No funds or resources of the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine are used for the Petition Project. The Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine has never received funds or resources from energy industries, and none of the scientists at the Institute have any funding whatever from corporations or institutions involved in hydrocarbon technology or energy production. "



    Another Rogue statement:

    "This petition falsely claimed to be a counter-consensus against the authentic consensus that climate change is happening."

    No signatory to the Petition Project has ever claimed that climate change is not happening.

    Can you please supply any evidence that man's CO2 emissions (and only man's CO2) is causing catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Angliss:

    You have posted your "denier" statement re the Petition Project.

    You have not addressed the Petition Project's Science:

    http://www.petitionproject.org/gw_article/GWReview_OISM150.pdf

    Can you please supply any evidence that man's CO2 emissions (and only man's CO2) is causing catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere?

    ReplyDelete





All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!