Just a paragraph from a post on Pierre Gosselin's great blog NoTricksZone.
It was written by Kenneth Richard who goes on to say:
Instead of supporting the “consensus” science, these 770 papers support the position that there are significant limitations and uncertainties apparent in climate modeling and the predictions of future climate catastrophes. Furthermore, these scientific papers strongly suggest that natural factors (the Sun, multi-decadal ocean oscillations [AMO/PDO, ENSO], cloud and aerosol albedo variations, etc.) have both in the past and present exerted a significant influence on weather and climate, which means an anthropogenic signal may be much more difficult to detect or distinguish as an “extremely likely” cause relative to natural variation. Papers questioning the “common-knowledge” viewpoints on ocean acidification, glacier melt and advance, sea level rise, extreme weather events, past climate forcing mechanisms, the “danger” of high CO2 concentrations, etc., have also been included in this volume of 770 papers.Mr Richard points out also that there are 240 papers supporting a Skeptical-of-the-Consensus Position for 2016 (here.)
Now, Question for Mainstream Media (MSM):
Will you still promote the Great Global Warming hoax? The hypothesis HAS been falsified. (see link) (see Scientific Method Falsified) AND Pauline Hanson's One Nation No2 Queensland candidate Malcolm Roberts looks like gaining an Australian Senate Seat.
Malcolm Roberts, with empirical evidence, can destroy the MSM's support of the hoax.