All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled. Dr David Deming

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:

Tuesday, 22 March 2016

Climate Council Cannot Count

No Curry for YOU!
Tim Flannery's Climate Council cannot count. We have pointed out before that they are of no account, but now, due to some Flim-Flammery they have reduced the  International Council for Science (ICSU) list of 20 women making waves in the climate change debate to 19.
So here’s a list of twenty women making waves in the climate change debate, offered in alphabetical order, and without any men to get in the way. We hope it shows off some of the quiet – and not so quiet – power women do have on this issue, and the diversity of the debate. Gender aside, this list reflects other diversities of the climate debate, with expertise in financial systems, workers’ rights, science, politics, development, media, diplomacy and more.
The Flim Flam Climate Council reduced the list to 19.


Because the list contained Dr Judith Curry. The ICSU's bio of Judith:

Blogger and scientist favoured by sceptics
Judith Curry is fast becoming the go-to scientist favoured by the more sceptical ends of the climate debate, though she is more than capable of making a name for herself in her own right. An established climate scientist, well known for her research on hurricanes and Arctic ice, Curry is currently Chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Troubled by the way those who do not fit with scientific consensus are treated by the scientific community and broader environmental discourse she regularly speaks up for the role of dissent and free speech in climate science. It is fair to say this doesn’t always win her friends in either science or the green movement. Curry is an active blogger, reflecting her commitment to transparency of the debate within science, and can be found on Twitter@curryja.  (bold added)
Tony Thomas has a well written piece on the Climate Council's chicanery for Quadrant Online.
The Climate Council’s deletion of Judith Curry from the 20 Women list bears a family resemblance to the revered Soviet practice which saw photos that originally included purged-and-shot apparatchiks doctored, the unwanted amanda mckenzieindividuals’ images made to disappear. At least the Soviets owned the photographs they doctored. The Climate Council doesn’t own the ICSU 20 women list and has no more right to delete  a woman it hates than to insert its own choice into the list. Perhaps we’re lucky the Council didn’t decide to re-make the list into 20 by replacing Curry with its winsome CEO Amanda McKenzie (left), who is more the telegenic cutie. That way, the odd, eye-catching numeral 19 could have been avoided. 
The Climate Council’s monkeying with a third party’s survey-based list hardly validates its claim:
We exist to provide independent, authoritative climate change information to the Australian public. Why? Because our response to climate change should be based on the best science available.

1 comment:

  1. All climatologists, Judith Curry as well, have indeed been very gullible in lapping up James Hansen's fictitious fiddled physics. Radiation cannot be compounded - as they do when they add back radiation and solar radiation and use the total in Stefan-Boltzmann calculations supposedly explaining Earth's mean surface temperature of 288K with a mean net inward flux of 390W/m^2, even though back radiation doesn't even penetrate the oceans. If one electric radiator raises an object to 350K I can assure you that 16 such radiators do NOT raise it to double the temperature, 700K. Every vortex cooling tube demonstrates how a force field (like centrifugal force) creates a radial temperature gradient, just as gravity does in every planetary troposphere. Is it a coincidence that the temperature gradient can be calculated the same way for every planet, with or without a solid surface - even without any solar radiation reaching the base of the troposphere, as is the case for Uranus and others?


All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!