All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled. Dr David Deming

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:

Thursday, 31 March 2016

AGW Scam exposed yet again.

A year ago, this blog reported United Nation’s top climate change official Christiana Figueres' press release where she admitted that the UNFCCC's aim was not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.

Another IPCC official Ottmar Edenhofer in November 2010 issued very similar thoughts. From 2008 to 2015 Edenhofer served as Co-Chair of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

AN interview published by Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ)
(google translated from German -bold added)

But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole.
And still the MSM push the AGW hoax. Still the shrill call us deniers. Turn the mirror around.

1 comment:

  1. All climatologists have indeed been very gullible in lapping up James Hansen's fictitious fiddled physics. Radiation cannot be compounded - as they do when they add back radiation and solar radiation and use the total in Stefan-Boltzmann calculations supposedly explaining Earth's mean surface temperature of 288K with a mean net inward flux of 390W/m^2, even though back radiation doesn't even penetrate the oceans. If one electric radiator raises an object to 350K I can assure you that 16 such radiators do NOT raise it to double the temperature, 700K. Every vortex cooling tube demonstrates how a force field (like centrifugal force) creates a radial temperature gradient, just as gravity does in every planetary troposphere. Is it a coincidence that the temperature gradient can be calculated the same way for every planet, with or without a solid surface - even without any solar radiation reaching the base of the troposphere, as is the case for Uranus and others?


All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!