As we know, the realist scientists "do it according to the trusted methods of ethical science" whereas the shrill turn the scientific method around. They reverse the scientific method.
From Vincent Gray's Book The Global Warming Scam and Climate Change Superscam Chapter 2 (LINK)
The Scientific Method:
Observation comes first. The hypothesis and then the theory arise from the observations. The validity of the theory depends on the efforts placed in its modification from future observations.
However, the shrill (including presumably Prof Chubb) have turned the " trusted methods of ethical science" on their head and reversed the Scientific Method.
Here the study begins with a proposed theory (man's CO2 emissions are causing catastrophic global warming) and the investigation consists of an attempt to find observations and make experiments which might confirm the theory.Reporting the same story, Shane Wright for the West reported Professor Chubb:
People who don't believe the climate is changing have clogged up his email systemReally? As Climate had changed since the beginning of time, I don't think that there could be many who "don't believe the climate is changing..." Is Professor Chubb confused? Does he mean people who have not been fooled by the CAGW Hoax? Has the good Professor kept up with the science? Is he not aware that, although atmospheric CO2 keeps rising, there has been a ~20 year plateau in the warming?
Thank Heaven there ARE scientists who "do it according to the trusted methods of ethical science" countering the government scientists pushing the falsified AGW hypothesis.