French Mathematicians blast AGW as “absurd, costly and pointless crusade"”.

A White Paper drawn up by the Société de Calcul Mathématique SA, a society of French mathematicians, is headed

"The battle against global warming: an absurd, costly and pointless crusade." (LINK)
All public policies, in France, Europe and throughout the world, find their origin and inspiration in the battle against global warming. The initial credo is simple: temperatures at the surface of the planet have been rising constantly for the past thirty years, and human beings are to blame. 
This is leading to all sorts of discussions, conferences and regulations, which are having an enormous impact on our economy. Every area of activity is affected: transport, housing, energy – to name just a few. Why do we need to save energy? It is quite simple: we have to reduce human impact on the planet. This is the fundamental credo.
It has become a crusade against Carbon dioxide (erroneously called carbon by the shrill) based in IPCC reports and, as the white paper says:
 taken up by the European Commission and the Member States. France, which likes to see itself as the 'good boy of Europe‘, adds an extra layer of virtue to every crusade. 
But mathematicians do not believe in crusades; they look at facts, figures, observations and arguments. 
Indeed so should scientists. So should journalists.

The mathematicians says that
 The crusade is absurd 
There is not a single fact, figure or observation that leads us to conclude that the world‘s climate is in any way 'disturbed'. It is variable, as it has always been, but rather less so now than during certain periods or geological eras. 
  • Concentrations of CO2 vary, as they always have done; the figures that are being released are biased and dishonest.
  • Rising sea levels are a normal phenomenon linked to upthrust buoyancy; they are nothing to do with so-called global warming. 
  • Extreme weather events – they are no more frequent now than they have been in the past.
The Society points out that, if the reports of the IPCC were "submitted for publication in a reputable scientific journal,"..."no sensible, high-quality journal would publish the IPCC‘s work."

"The mastiff Liberty growls and shows its sharp teeth" (Victor Hugo: Les Châtiments [Castigations])
In a democracy, there is an opposition, and this opposition has a right, in principle, to express its views: this is what distinguishes democracy from dictatorship. But when it comes to the questions about global warming that we are talking about here, the opposition – people who do not believe in global warming – have been told to shut up: no public debate, no contradictory discourse, no articles in scientific journals. They have simply been told that the case is proven and it is time to take action. 
In law, there is a fundamental principle known as the 'adversarial principle'. A case can be thrown out of court if the defense is not informed of every known element of the accusation. Even if twenty people have witnessed the abominable criminal commit his offense, if the defense has not had access to blood-sample analyses, the case will be thrown out. In the case of global warming, a number of bodies are telling us they have all the evidence, but refuse to tell us what it is. The data have been processed, but how? Time series have been altered, but why? Some phenomena have been left out of the equation, but on what grounds? We do not know, and we are simply required to keep quiet and do what we are told. No second opinion is permitted. 
It is on the debris of the fundamental principles of the law and of democracy that this White Paper has been written.
See The translation of this white paper HERE (pdf).


  1. I suppose a variety of AGW deniers' various number-free climate models could be true. But on the other hand, clear and simple, CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Up this in the air and, as simple as keeping a window shut, more heat stays in.
    Still, the events we're seeing that match the predictions of AGW - (melting glaciers, more extreme weather, thinning arctic ice, colder weather for Europe, melting permafrost, species migrations, massive Antarctic ice shelves breaking off, more droughts in Russia and the prairies, record temperatures), could all be simply unrelated, and too, we could have a whole army of dishonest and evil scientists who are not reporting honestly on what they're seeing, (and big oil and big coal do steadfastly tell us this - and heaven knows, they certainly have our best interests in mind), but... but sometimes I wonder...

    1. Antrobus should try reading the White Paper and he will see that their conclusions are based on careful, objective analysis of all the data. His opinions are the regurgitations of environmental propagandists. The concept of a greenhouse gas effect is pure fiction. The atmosphere is not the confining window pane of a room: it is free to expand upward by bouyancy and allows cooler air from the surrounding to replace the air warmed by the sun. It is called natural convection and you experience it on a beach in the afternoon.

    2. "as simple as keeping a window shut,"


      is there enough gaff tape in the world to fix your "stupid" ?

      "simple as".. an apt description.

    3. Let's go through your list.

      (melting glaciers, * have been melting since well before any CO2 rise, we have just come out of the coldest period in 10,000 years

      more extreme weather, * no, hurricanes and all extreme weather are down.

      thinning arctic ice, * no. Arctic ice is now growing again since the AMO has switched.

      colder weather for Europe, * obviously due toglobal warming. ;-)

      melting permafrost, * no.. even if it did.. remember that any organic matter was once live.. therefore it was warmer.

      species migrations, * oh like that's never happened before.

      massive Antarctic ice shelves breaking off, * Antarctic shows no warming over the whole satellite record, southern sea temps are cooling

      more droughts in Russia and the prairies, * which of course have never happened before.

      record temperatures. there has been no warming for 18 years. The only warming in the whole of the satellite data was the non-anthropogenic El Nino step around 1998 . The length of the data is tiny. It was most certainly warmer in the first 3/4 of the Holocene, when the Arctic was very often ice free in summer.

      So really.. everything you have posted is just a load of IGNORANT propaganda BS.

    4. ps "massive Antarctic ice shelves breaking off, "

      Its called "calving" and happens all the time... just ask the Titanic.

      oh wait.. that's the AGW ship you are on. ;-)

  2. Interesting comment: Not much truth in it but this bit is true:

    "whole army of dishonest and evil scientists who are not reporting honestly on what they're seeing"

    Interesting Point on your CO2 comment. Atmospheric CO2 keeps rising but there has been no global warming for ~20 years.

  3. AN astrophysicist's comment:

    This is a significant break in the scientific society monopoly enjoyed by Alarmists. With mathematicians the most rigorous of scientists, I'm not surprised that they would be among the first to break with the scam. They certainly know what constitutes a tight logical argument and should easily spot the gaping holes in alarmist reasoning. And they may not be well funded by the climate establishment, making it easier for them to bear witness to the truth.


Post a Comment

All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!