Claim that 97% of scientists support climate alarm cannot be supported

Claim that 97% of scientists support climate alarm cannot be supported


This study design may simply be a circular argument In my column I pointed out that people who invoke the 97 per cent consensus often leave vague what is actually being agreed upon. John Cook does this too: Note that his wording is consistent with a range of interpretations, including that greenhouse gases definitely cause only…





Comments

  1. In short, anyone, including the POTUS, who cites Cook's 97 per cent, is either deceptive in turn or has been deceived. Be they active or passive 97 per cent'ers they ought be wary of those who come to realise that they attempted deception.
    In democracies voters have ultimate choice when it comes to political deception.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment





All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!