"Climate change" means a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods
So, from the beginning of the "climate science" movement, "Climate Change" only meant Human Caused Climate Change ( or anthropogenic Global Warming- AGW.)
How did this come about?
Paul Ehrlich's book The Population Bomb led the Club Of Rome's senior member Maurice Strong (who made his fortune from fossil-fuel) to wonder: (link)
What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the earth comes from the actions of rich countries?
Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialised civilizations to collapse. Isn't it our responsibilty to bring this about?This was in 1992. Nothing has changed in more than twenty years. This year, UNFCCC head Christiana Figueres announced: (Link)
Our aim is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.IN the minds of these idealogues, man's enemy is man.
So how do you demonise industrialised civilizations?
The Club of Rome came up with the method: (link)
The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.The President of the UN Foundation: (link)
We've got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the Environment: (link)
No matter if the science of global warming is all phony...climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.Science Fiction Movie Producer Al Gore: (link)
I believe it is appropriate to have an 'over-representation' of the facts on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience.So, how do you bring it about?
IN her book Cloak Of Green, Elaine Dewar wrote that Maurice Strong (Link)
was using the UN as a platform to sell a global environment crisis and the Global Governance AgendaNeil Hrab wrote that Strong began his agenda at the 1977 UN Conference on Human Environment: (link)
Three Specific goals were set out by the Secretary General, Maurice Strong - a declaration on the human environment, an action plan and an organisational structure supported by a World Environment Fund.Long story short - Strong organised and chaired the "Earth Summit" conference at Rio and Strong's agenda of controlling climate science through politics came into being.
As Tim Ball writes:
Now the challenge is to perpetuate the misinformation and divert scientists who despite personal attacks, denial of funding and exclusion from national level conferences continued to pursue the scientific method.So the UNEP was formed. Out of that agency and in conjunction with the WMO, they created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
As detailed above, the definition of Climate Change included " a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity..."
Even today, the IPCC still does not look at all causations of climate change but only at human causes: (IPCC Link)
..to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation.
Forget Sun spots, clouds or any other contributors to climate, put on the blinkers and just look at anthropogenic causes.
Thanks to Tim Ball's Book The Deliberate Corruption Of Climate Science And Quotes from The GREEN Agenda.