All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled. Dr David Deming

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:

Tuesday, 16 December 2014

Would you buy a moronic questionnaire from Morons?

A moronic website has posted a moronic post:

10 Questions For Climate Change Deniers
Look at their moronic first question: 
Would you buy a falsified AGW hypothesis from this man?

Picture Question: Look at the picture of Lord Monckton above. Would you buy a used car from this man?
The Morons are using an ad-hominem about Lord Monckton's medical condition. I challenge the morons to debate Lord Monckton. After the debate, the Morons would crawl off defeated and shamed.

Their second Moronic question: Why do only 24 out of 13950 peer-reviewed papers dispute man-made climate change?

This is from the 2004 Naomi Oreskes paper.

Friends of Science deconstructed this paper and found that the percentage was the reverse of Oreskes' finding. Only 1.2% of the papers Actually Explicitly Agreed with the IPCC declaration: (LINK) Oreskes' Same Old Crap Fictional Leaflet showed that she didn't even understand that vital-to-life carbon dioxide is colourless.

The third moronic question:
why do billionaires secretly have to throw hundreds of millions of dollars into denialist propaganda?
Why do they used the pejorative and false term "deniers." The REAL deniers are the Alarmists. (LINK) Tom Steyer vainly donated $58 million trying to prop up support for the falsified CAGW hypothesis during US mid-term Elections.

If the morons had done their research, they would have found that the sceptics receive only a trifle compared to the funding pushing the climate hoax. As Jo Nova wrote: (Link)
It takes a lot of money to keep a false idea alive.  This is just another Wall of Money. Yet despite that, skeptics are winning battles, unwinding schemes, shrinking the Green gravy trains, and spreading the word.  It’s amazing what a small group of volunteers and barely funded skeptics can achieve with only their wits and truth on their side.
And again:

Big-Green have more money than Big-Oil but the media are blind to it.

Should we pursue any more of the morons' moronic questions?

Well, here is a really stupid question showing they didn't do any research.
Why are there no Climate Scientists for the denial sceptical side? Name One
Take your pick!

Tim Ball, Gordon Fulks, George Taylor, John Christy, David Deming, Ivar Giaever, The Idsos, David Legates, Bob Carter, Willie Soon, Ole Humlum, Chris de Freitas, Judith Curry, Freeman Dyson, Steve Koonin, Denis Rancourt, William Happer, Bill Kininmonth, Don Easterbrook, Garth Paltridge, Ian Plimer, Murry Salby, Nir Shaviv, Fred Singer, Nils-Axel Morner, Richard Lindzen and another 31,000 or so.

And the moronic  questions continue. To show how scientific they get, just look at their last bit of stupidity:
  1. Look at yourself in a mirror. Does that look like a person who can grasp scientific concepts? a) Yes, b) No, c) I can’t read – I’ve no idea how I got this far through the post.
Actually it is amazing that the morons could write that far into a post.

No comments:

Post a Comment

All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!