All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled. Dr David Deming

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf

Friday, 26 December 2014

No Global Warming Period will soon be Longer than the Global Warming Period

Peter Ferrara writing for Forbes.com notes that

The Period Of No Global Warming Will Soon Be Longer Than the Period of Actual Global Warming


If you look at the record of global temperature data, you will find that the late 20th Century period of global warming actually lasted about 20 years, from the late 1970s to the late 1990s. Before that, the globe was dominated by about 30 years of global cooling, giving rise in the 1970s to media discussions of the return of the Little Ice Age (circa 1450 to 1850), or worse. 
But the record of satellite measurements of global atmospheric temperatures now shows no warming for at least 17 years and 5 months, from September, 1996 to January, 2014, as shown on the accompanying graphic. That is surely 17 years and 6 months now, accounting for February.

It is now 18 years and 2 months but what's a few months between friends. A child who started their schooling in 1996, would be around 23 years of age now. That child was probably taught about catastrophic global warming all through the schooling but in fact there has been NO warming during that period.
If you look at the record of global temperature data, you will find that the late 20th Century period of global warming actually lasted about 20 years, from the late 1970s to the late 1990s. Before that, the globe was dominated by about 30 years of global cooling, giving rise in the 1970s to media discussions of the return of the Little Ice Age (circa 1450 to 1850), or worse. 
But the record of satellite measurements of global atmospheric temperatures now shows no warming for at least 17 years and 5 months, from September, 1996 to January, 2014, as shown on the accompanying graphic. That is surely 17 years and 6 months now, accounting for February.
Ferrara then discusses the solar activity previously addressed in these pages and then continues:
Britain’s Met Office, an international cheerleading headquarters for global warming hysteria, conceded in December, 2012 that there would be no further warming at least through 2017, which would make 21 years with no global warming. The German Herald reported on March 31, 2013 regarding Russian scientist Dr Habibullo Abdussamatov from the St. Petersburg Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory, “Talking to German media the scientist who first made his prediction in 2005 said that after studying sunspots and their relationship with climate change on Earth, we are now on an ‘unavoidable advance towards a deep temperature drop.’” His colleague Yuri Nagovitsyn is quoted in The Voice of Russia saying, “we could be in for a cooling period that lasts 200-250 years.” Skepticism over the theory of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming is increasingly embraced in China and elsewhere in Asia as well.
Read More HERE

9 comments:

  1. It's Feynman, not Feynmann. And neither does it matter how many claim to agree with your theory, nor how many papers that proclaim it pass peer review and get published ...

    ReplyDelete
  2. A little over 2% of warming from CO2 goes into the Atmosphere, over 90% of the warming goes into the ocean which is shown in this graph (http://postimg.org/image/n69h4zse5/). This warming from CO2 is measured which can be seen in this graph (http://postimg.org/image/73jz83e0h/). Now we only need to look at ocean temperatures in the graph below to determine if CO2 warming has stopped (http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/3M_HEAT_CONTENT/heat_content2000m.png).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This graph is interesting: http://jonova.s3.amazonaws.com/graphs/ocean/global-ocean-temperature-0-700m.gif

      More here: http://joannenova.com.au/2013/05/ocean-temperatures-is-that-warming-statistically-significant/

      Delete
    2. Global Warming Realist29 December 2014 at 08:24

      If GPS systems are only accurate to 7.5 meters at a 95% confidence level how are scientists measuring a 2 mm annual sea rise from AGW?

      http://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/performance/accuracy/

      I don't see how such small sea level rise can be measured.

      http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/earth/oceanography/question356.htm

      I'll add AGW sea rise to other baseless fabrications "AGW acidification" & "AGW dead zones"

      Delete
    3. Global Warming Realist, usually sea level rise is determined by tide gauges and more recently by satellites. The satellite data confirms the tide gauges which can be seen in these graphs. (http://postimg.org/image/hktjdk6gv/) (http://postimg.org/image/6qc3bmncv/)

      Delete
    4. "The slowing sea level rise is extra problematic because it forms the backbone of the excuse for the long pause in surface warming that wasn’t supposed to happen either. The fact that it coincided with the global pause in surface temperatures was no comfort at all. The missing heat, after all, must be hidden in the oceans, and that must be causing the oceans to rise even faster than they were before (an obvious, inescapable fact of physics). So now climate modelers are forced to stack excuses — they need an excuse for the excuse. (It’s excuses-squared in the name of science.)"

      http://joannenova.com.au/2014/04/sea-level-rise-has-slowed-it-must-be-time-to-correct-that-data/

      Delete
  3. Geoff Brown your link is based on climate models, since the implementation of the ARGO floats they have shown that during the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation negative phase large amounts of heat are pushed below the 2000m that the ARGO floats measure. This deep ocean warming is explained in this graph (http://postimg.org/image/m5q581v6r/)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A paper published in Nature Climate Change finds the deep oceans [below 2000 meters] cooled from 2005-2013:

      http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com.au/2014/10/new-paper-is-huge-blow-to-cagw-missing.html

      Many other debunkings of the "deep ocean" myth.

      Delete
    2. Anonymoose. The ARGO floats DO NOT go beyond 2,000m, therefore they CANNOT measure 'ocean heat content' below 2,000m. There is very limited data for 'ocean heat content' below 2,000m......that's why the warmies say that's where the 'missing heat' is......because it can't be measured!

      http://www.argo.ucsd.edu/About_Argo.html

      HadCM3 is a climate model used in IPCC AR3 (TAR) in 2001.
      HadGEM1 & 2 are nothing but 'climate prediction models' and were used in AR4 & AR5 respectfully.

      Models are not evidence or observed data.

      FYI Anonymoose, the actual observed and recorded average ocean temperature increase from Jan 2004 to Oct 2014 @ 2,000m, as recorded by ARGO, is 0.04C (2.616C - 2.620C).

      Delete





All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!