John Hinderaker, writing for Powerline, has a piece with the title:
MODERN SCIENCE REFUTES GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM
It isn’t quite true to say that the science is settled–climate science is in its infancy, and we have only a poor understanding of the Earth’s climate. Just about every proposition is controversial. But we are very close to being able to say that, as to global warming alarmism, the debate is over and the alarmists have lost. (I mean, of course, the scientific debate, not the political one, which never had much to do with science in the first place.) (bold added)The amazing point is that as the evidence piles up debunking the falsified man made global warming hypothesis, the Alarmists push more and more ridiculous scares: e.g.
- Global Warming helped create ISIS;
- Global Warming causes cold weather;
- Global Warming causes 12 diseases including Ebola virus;
- Global Warming causes growth in Antarctic Sea Ice
And all this happening despite 18 years hiatus in Global Warming.
Mr Hinderaker continues:
The problem for alarmists is that contemporary research doesn’t support any such scenario. The most recent nail in the alarmists’ coffin is a paper by Nic Lewis and Judith Curry titled “The implications for climate sensitivity of AR5 forcing and heat uptake estimates,” which concluded that the best estimate of equilibrium climate sensitivity is 1.64 degrees C. Lewis describes the paper’s methodology here, and you can follow the link to the paper and read it for yourself.
The Lewis/Curry paper is consistent with recent scholarship, which pretty universally finds that the UN’s IPCC projections are far out of line.Pat Michaels and Chip Knappenberger write of the Lewis/Curry paper - Collection of Evidence
Nic Lewis and Judith Curry just published a blockbuster paper that pegs the earth’s equilibrium climate sensitivity—how much the earth’s average surface temperature is expected to rise in association with a doubling of the atmosphere’s carbon dioxide concentration—at 1.64°C (1.05°C to 4.05°C, 90% range), a value that is nearly half of the number underpinning all of President Obama’s executive actions under his Climate Action Plan.
The publication of the Lewis and Curry paper, along with another by Ragnhild Skeie and colleagues, brings the number of recent low-sensitivity climate publications to 14, by 42 authors from around the world (this doesn’t count our 2002 paper on the topic, “Revised 21st Century Temperature Projections”). Most of these sensitivities are a good 40% below the average climate sensitivity of the models used by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Read more of John Hinderaker's piece HERE