More Nails in the CAGW Coffin

Although the Great Global Warming Swindle has been mortally wounded, the Global Warming Nazis continue to push the falsified man-made global warming hoax.

The latest litany of lies listed in the White House’s release of its National Climate Assessment has created more nails for the Catastrophic Global Warming hoax's coffin.

There are various responses showing the errors in the White House report; for example Chip Knappenberger and Pat Michaels'

What the National Climate Assessment Doesn’t Tell You

The bias in the National Climate Assessment (NCA) towards pessimism (which we have previously detailed here) has implications throughout the federal regulatory process because the NCA is cited (either directly or indirectly) as a primary source for the science of climate change for justifying federal regulation aimed towards mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. Since the NCA gets it wrong, so does everyone else. 
A good example of this can be found in how climate change is effecting  the human response during heat waves.  The NCA foresees an increasing frequency and magnitude of heat waves leading to growing numbers of heat-related deaths. The leading science suggests just the opposite.
Case and point. Last week, we had an article published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Nature Climate Change that showed how the impacts of extreme heat are often overplayed while the impacts of adaptation to the heat are underplayed.  And a new paper has just been published in the journalEnvironmental Health Perspectives that finds that the risk of dying from heat waves in the U.S. has been on the decline for the past several decades. 
By now, this should be rather unsurprising as it has been demonstrated over and over again. Not only in the U.S. but in Europe (and yes, Stockholm) and other major global cities as well.  

Read more at Cato - LINK.

Some responses from the Heartland Institute: (LINK)

James M Taylor:
“This laughably misleading report is the predictable result when hard-core environmental activists are chosen to write up a climate assessment for, and subject to the approval and revisions of, the Obama administration. It is like the punch line to a bad joke: ‘How many environmental activists does it take to put together an alarmist global warming report?’

Alan Caruba:
“What a different nation America could be were it not for Obama’s deliberate attack on the coal industry and other fossil fuels sources. In the name of reducing emissions climatologists believe play a minor role in climate change, Obama deliberately ignores the increasing use of coal in nations like China, Japan, and India. Nothing the U.S. does will impact the climate when the use of fossil fuels by other nations is factored in.”
Marc Morano:
"This report is contrary to peer-reviewed studies and observations. By every measure, so called extreme weather is showing no trend or declining trends on 50-100 year timescales. Droughts, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes are not increasing due to man-made global warming.  
"Why does the report now call 'global warming' a new name, so-called 'climate disruption'? Simple answer: Due to earth's failure to warm -- no global warming for nearly 18 years - another name was necessary to attempt to gin up fear. Now every storm is offerred up as some sort of 'proof' of global warming. 
Further  Responses:

Dr Judith Curry:

While there is some useful analysis in the report, it is hidden behind a false premise that any change in the 20th century has been caused by AGW.  Worse yet is the spin being put on this by the Obama administration.  

The failure to imagine future extreme events and climate scenarios, other than those that are driven by CO2 emissions and simulated by deficient climate models, has the potential to increase our vulnerability to future climate surprises (see my recent presentation on this Generating possibility distributions of scenarios for regional climate change).  As an example, the Report highlights the shrinking of winter ice in the Great Lakes:  presently, in May, Lake Superior is 30% cover by ice, which is apparently unprecedented in the historical record.
Dr Roger Cohen:
The central government's claims of more extreme weather are pure fabrication. They expect us to believe that every storm, drought, flood, or whatever is due to driving your SUV. Like an astrology forecast, their so called "science" is made to fit everything that happens after the fact, but they predict nothing that actually happens. Indeed the world has not warmed at all for more than 15 years, despite their predictions that it would. For those who want to see the real facts, consult for example the Congressional testimony of Dr. John Christy, Distinguished Professor of Atmospheric Science, Alabama’s State Climatologist and Director of the Earth System Science Center at The University of Alabama in Huntsville. 
If anything there has been a decline in strong tornadoes, hurricane landfalls, droughts, wildfires, and record highs. Yet the propaganda grinds on as the central government continues to reach for yet more power over all of us.
Roger Pielke Jr:
How many more nails do we need to finally seal that coffin?