Are the Himalayan glaciers retreating? NO!

The Resilient Earth
Not according to a new peer-reviewed paper by Bahuguna et al, publishing in Current Science.

GWPF reports: (link)
I. M. Bahuguna et al publishing in Current Science studied changes to 2,000 glaciers in various Himalayan regions between 2001 to 2011. They conclude that 1,700 were stable, showing the same surface area and no change of direction. 
248 glaciers exhibited a retreat, and 18 an advance. The scientists estimate a net loss of glacier area of about 10,000 km2 – that’s a 0.2 per cent decrease (+/- 2.5pc), and an average retreat of 2.1 metres annually.
And a slap in the face for Pachauri and the IPCC:
India stepped up its own scientific research after shoddy work was exposed in the 2007 IPCC AR4 report into climate impacts. That report claimed the Himalayan glaciers would disappear entirely by 2035, leading to widespread drought, starvation and migration. It was rubbish, as the unapologetic IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri, was forced to admit. 

From Barbara Hollingsworth in cnsnews: (link)
 Nearly 87 percent of Himalayan glaciers are currently “stable,” neither melting nor advancing, according to a new study that cast further doubt on claims that melting glacial ice will help cause a dramatic rise in sea levels this century. 
Often referred to as the “Third Pole,” the Himalayans contain “one of the largest concentrations of glaciers outside the polar regions,” 
Andrew Orlowski for The Register exposed the shoddy IPCC report: (link)
Indian Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh has described the IPCC as “alarmist”. 
“The clear and well-established standards of evidence required by the IPCC procedures were not applied properly", Pachauri and co admitted in a 2010 statement [PDF], adding that "poorly substantiated estimates" of the speed of glacier melting found their way past the apparently most exhaustive review process in the world. 
The 2035 date was based on just three sources, none of which had even been subjected to peer review: one was a report by eco-campaigners at the WWF, and another a news item in New Scientist. Both are so-called “grey literature”.