Skip to main content

The Australian Climate Sceptics Blog

Search This Blog

Subscribe to this blog

Follow by Email

Green Energy Breakthrough

Posted by Geoff on April 02, 2014

Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Simple explanation of the GREEN energy breakthrough!

H/t Bernie K

Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Comments

Post a Comment

All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!

Favourite Pages

Andrew Bolt
Blogger Buzz
Climate Audit
Climate Depot
Deplorable Climate Science Blog
Dr Tim Ball
Galileo Movement
ICECAP (Joe D'Aleo)
International Climate Science Coalition
Jenn's Blog
Joanne Nova
Tom Nelson
Wise Energy
WUWT

Popular Posts

Extreme Exaggeration of the Climate Commission.

Climate Commission: extreme exaggeration and high risk of being wrong

The increase in CO2 is not due to humans

The increase in CO2 is not due to humans, therefore alarmism and all the money spent on it has no basis. Anthony Cox
This is a key issue: whether humans are responsible for all or most of the increase in atmospheric CO2. If they are not then it does not matter if alarmists believe that CO2 is the dominant greenhouse gas, which it is not because the increase is natural. Human CO2 is a very small % of the total CO2 going into the atmosphere, The % of human CO2 going into the atmosphere is shown by Figure 7.3, AR4, 3.67% (218.2 GT divided by 8 GT): Figure 7.3 AR4: Of the total CO2 emissions 98.5% are reabsorbed: EIA, Table 3 2004: The reabsorption of CO2 does not distinguish between human and natural CO2, so the human contribution to the increase is 3.67% of 1.5%. This amount, the human contribution has not changed in 150 years. The human contribution to the increase in atmospheric CO2 is called the airborne fraction. The AF has not changed: https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/k…

The Logarithmic Effect of Carbon Dioxide.

The Logarithmic Effect of Carbon Dioxide. Well, what the heck does that mean? To this burnt out old Rock and Roller it means that the worst warming has been done and that warming was done long, long ago. Look at this graph prepared by David Archibald:
For WUWT, David wrote :
The greenhouse gasses keep the Earth 30°C warmer than it would otherwise be without them in the atmosphere, so instead of the average surface temperature being -15°C, it is 15°C. Carbon dioxide contributes 10% of the effect so that is 3°C. The pre-industrial level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was 280 ppm. So roughly, if the heating effect was a linear relationship, each 100 ppm contributes 1°C. With the atmospheric concentration rising by 2 ppm annually, it would go up by 100 ppm every 50 years and we would all fry as per the IPCC predictions.But the relationship isn’t linear, it is logarithmic.Lo and behold, the first 20 ppm accounts for over half of the heating effect to the pre-industrial level of 280 ppm…

Powered by Blogger