Skip to main content

The Australian Climate Sceptics Blog

Search This Blog

Subscribe to this blog

Follow by Email

Green Energy Breakthrough

Posted by Geoff Brown on April 02, 2014

Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Google+
Email
Other Apps

Simple explanation of the GREEN energy breakthrough!

H/t Bernie K

Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Google+
Email
Other Apps

Comments

Post a Comment

All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!

Google+ Badge

Favourite Pages

Andrew Bolt
Blogger Buzz
Climate Audit
Climate Depot
Deplorable Climate Science Blog
Dr Tim Ball
Galileo Movement
ICECAP (Joe D'Aleo)
International Climate Science Coalition
Jenn's Blog
Joanne Nova
Tom Nelson
Wise Energy
WUWT

Popular Posts

Extreme Exaggeration of the Climate Commission.

Climate Commission: extreme exaggeration and high risk of being wrong

The ABC is out of control.

Opinion by Anthony Cox
I wrote before about the ABC’s bias and the real cost of the ABC to the Australian community. Since then the Abbott government has announced reasonable budget cuts but the ABC has sunk further into its betrayal of its Charter and of the Australian community.
In a recent poll about the farcical China/US deal about emissions the ABC’s The Drum initially showed this result: 12/11/2014: China and the US have struck a new deal to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Do you think Australia will need to adjust its climate change policies as a result? No 55%
Yes 44%
Unsure 1%

15205 votes counted Given the ABC’s Left/Green readership a remarkable result. However shortly the result was changed to this: 12/11/2014: China and the US have struck a new deal to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Do you think Australia will need to adjust its climate change policies as a result?
Yes 76% No 23% Unsure 1% 6001 votes counted How could you trust an organisation which lies like that and distorts public …

The EFFECT MUST always FOLLOW the CAUSE; Climate Alarmists Fail Science 101

Great post on CO2islife. One of, if not the greatest flaws in the CAGW Theory is that it has its cause and effect reversed. CAGW is like claiming lung-cancer causes smoking. For the CAGW Theory to be valid, CO2 would have to increase, and then Temperatures would have to increase. The increase in CO2 would cause temperatures to increase. Problem is, that doesn't happen. Temperatures increase first and then CO2 increases. There is also no defined mechanism by which CO2 would increase before temperatures to pull the globe out of an ice-age/glaciation, or for CO2 to decline in advance of an ice-age/glaciation. The CAGW simply can't explain the majority of the observations in the geologic record.
Read more: CO2islife

Powered by Blogger