Skip to main content

The Australian Climate Sceptics Blog

Search This Blog

Subscribe to this blog

Follow by Email

Green Energy Breakthrough

Posted by Geoff Brown on April 02, 2014

Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Simple explanation of the GREEN energy breakthrough!

H/t Bernie K

Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Comments

Post a Comment

All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!

Favourite Pages

Andrew Bolt
Blogger Buzz
Climate Audit
Climate Depot
Deplorable Climate Science Blog
Dr Tim Ball
Galileo Movement
ICECAP (Joe D'Aleo)
International Climate Science Coalition
Jenn's Blog
Joanne Nova
Tom Nelson
Wise Energy
WUWT

Popular Posts

Extreme Exaggeration of the Climate Commission.

Climate Commission: extreme exaggeration and high risk of being wrong

Changes to Darwin’s Climate History are Not Logical

Changes to Darwin’s Climate History are Not LogicalBy Jennifer Marohasy
February 23, 2019 THE hubris of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology is on full display with its most recent remodelling of the historic temperature record for Darwin. The Bureau has further dramatically increased the rate of global warming at Darwin by further artificially lowering historic temperatures. This begins by shortening the historical temperature record so that it begins just after the very hot years of the Federation drought. Then by changing the daily values: that is changing the observed measured temperatures to something else. For example, on 1st January 1910, the maximum temperature recorded at the Darwin post office was 34.2ºC. A few years ago, the Bureau changed this to 33.8ºC, cooling the recorded temperature by 0.4 degrees. In its most recent re-revision of Darwin’s climate history the temperature on this day has been further reduced and is now just 32.8. The daily maximum temperatures for early…

The increase in CO2 is not due to humans

The increase in CO2 is not due to humans, therefore alarmism and all the money spent on it has no basis. Anthony Cox
This is a key issue: whether humans are responsible for all or most of the increase in atmospheric CO2. If they are not then it does not matter if alarmists believe that CO2 is the dominant greenhouse gas, which it is not because the increase is natural. Human CO2 is a very small % of the total CO2 going into the atmosphere, The % of human CO2 going into the atmosphere is shown by Figure 7.3, AR4, 3.67% (218.2 GT divided by 8 GT): Figure 7.3 AR4: Of the total CO2 emissions 98.5% are reabsorbed: EIA, Table 3 2004: The reabsorption of CO2 does not distinguish between human and natural CO2, so the human contribution to the increase is 3.67% of 1.5%. This amount, the human contribution has not changed in 150 years. The human contribution to the increase in atmospheric CO2 is called the airborne fraction. The AF has not changed: https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/k…

Powered by Blogger