All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled. Dr David Deming

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf

Wednesday, 26 March 2014

The Global Warming Nazis are getting even more extreme.

Geochemist James Lawrence Powell continues to claim, the only people still debating whether or not climate change is “real,” and caused by human activity, are the ones who aren’t doing the actual research.

Well, I can tell Mr Powell that climate does change and has changed through all eternity so, to answer his first leg, "YES!" Climate Change is "real."

Is Climate Change caused by human activity. Well, also a qualified "YES!" The question Powell should ask is - "Are Humans' emissions of carbon dioxide causing catastrophic global warming?" As there has been no significant warming for more than 17 years, the answer to this must be "NO!"

Powell claims that he went through "
every scientific study published in a peer-review journal during the calendar year 2013." This blog before has answered and destroyed these outlandish claims and found them all lacking substance:


and many more......

To check that he was on the right track, he could have done a check with the NIPCC. The NIPCC ("Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change")  is an international panel of nongovernment scientists and scholars who have come together to understand the causes and consequences of climate change from a sceptical viewpoint, looking at information which is routinely ignored by the official U.N. body, the IPCC.

The NIPCC regularly reviewing the peer-reviews scientific literature and archives those reviews on their website. 

The second tranch of the NIPCC's Climate Change Reconsidered (CCRll) will be launched  Wednesday, April 9, 8:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. at National Press Club in Washington, DC

Geochemist James Lawrence Powell says: "the only people still debating whether or not climate change is “real,” and caused by human activity, are the ones who aren’t doing the actual research."

If you look at the names behind the NIPCC ( they are found here) all are scientists who have done research and most if not all have published papers.

Were their papers included in Powell's "
every scientific study published in a peer-review journal ..."

You can bet your sweet bippy they were NOT!

2 comments:

  1. Did you bother to check Powell's research methodology or his database. All is on his website.

    BTW - he has updated his findings.

    ReplyDelete
  2. People have checked Powell and quickly found his studies majorly flawed.
    - His own side should have immediately pointed out he was using a strawman argument to misrepresent climate skeptics.
    April 2013 - "Meaningless" say PopTech and simply lists the flaws
    July 2014 - WattsUpWith That simply points out how Powell stacked the deck : Basically "You have to actually “clearly and explicitly state that the theory of global warming is false " for your paper to counted in the against camp.
    March 2014 : Anti-green repeat their previous debunk
    - Powell's own blog tells of an update in November-December issue of Skeptical Inquirer

    BTW I did find a warmist at Australia's Royal Institution that seemed to reject the paper, but then at the end he accepted Cook & Nuccitelli flawed 97% study as OK

    ReplyDelete





All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!