That means 97% NON CONSENSUS!
Their summary begins:
The 97% scientific consensus on human-caused global warming is frequently
cited as the justification for the imposition of carbon taxes and extreme
climate change or greenhouse gas reduction targets “…to stop dangerous
climate change” At least 5 separate surveys since 2004 claim a 97% consensus, or in the case of Oreskes (2004) – a 75% consensus saying “Remarkably, none of the papers disagreed with the consensus position.”
In fact, Friends of Science deconstruction of these surveys reveals there is no such consensus. [Figure 1 below]
SO, using the Actual % column above we get
Doran And Zimmerman 96.6%
Andregg et al 34.0%
Cook et al 99.46%
Let's just say 97% NON CONSENSUS.
See Friends of Science pdf - HERE