Suzuki and Flannery
by Anthony Cox
This only to be expected; if these people really believe
that CO2 is going to destroy the world then abolishing the propaganda unit
which they also believe is going to save the world will naturally produce
outrage.
That Flannery and the CC could dominate Australian media and
political process is a damning indictment of the gullibility of our media and
politicians.
The true believers in AGW are however implacable. With
Flannery gone they have turned to the imminent IPCC AR5 report ignoring that
even the IPCC has faced the fact there has been no warming for a climatically
significant period and resorting to the
usual
alarmism and misanthropy with AGW and by implication humans being compared
to
cancer.
As usual amidst all this hyperbole and frantic nonsense the
ABC has taken a leading role, importing Suzuki and allowing him a full hour of
prime time, taxpayer-funded exposure on Q&A where he will be given
the honour of being the
only person on the panel.
No doubt the audience will be the usual mixture of Greens
and Greens pretending to be conservatives producing the sort of balance which
only appears within AGW and of the sort which allows AGW to be validated
through such corrupted concepts as the
consensus.
The NCTCS have been invited to this farce. But any
discussion [sic] about AGW on the ABC is always a stacked deck. Who can forget
the ambush of Durkin in 2007 by Tony Jones and Robin Williams and a panel of
sceptics who came in good faith to discuss Durkin’s
The Great Global Warming Swindle.
Both Jones and Williams are devout believers of AGW with
both hosting outside pro-AGW events such as Gore agitprop and
pro-Green
events.
The unofficial editorial policy at the ABC is obviously
pro-AGW and a dominating interviewer like Jones will ensure that pro-AGW view
is enforced simply through his technique of
interrupting.
It is not a particularly skilful technique but it is
effective. Recently I called into 2SM to the Meryl Swanson show. In my opinion
Swanson is unabashedly pro-AGW and on this occasion she cleverly included the
old lie about sceptics being funded by big fossil into her chatter by referring
to a letter published in that rag, the SMH. I took offence but by the simple
expedient of being continually interrupted could not mount a sustained rebuttal.
Even more skilful talkers like Monckton are stymied by this
technique.
So, any alternative viewpoint would be on a hiding to
nothing by putting their head on the ABC chopping block.
It is a shame really because Suzuki’s pernicious influence
needs to be countered. His science, as with all AGW science, is deplorable as
is well described by
Roger
Franklin.
Suzuki’s character has also been put under the spotlight by
EzraLevant. What Levant shows is that Suzuki is not only making a great deal of
money out of AGW but exploits those he deals with in a creepy fashion.
Yet Suzuki is the paragon of AGW spokespersons. And you can
bet your bottom dollar, if AGW hasn’t taken it already, that the sycophants at
the ABC will not let any critical question about Suzuki be put to air.
This is the nature of AGW: wrong, corrupt, expensive and a
continual insult by people who have sneaked their way into power and influence
and who now abuse that power to the detriment of the community.
Maggots indeed.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
You may wish to contact Suzuki and ask him some hard questions -
So now I’m wondering whether the ABC is paying Suzuki similar fees to appear on ABC shows?
This clip needs to be everywhere.. what a creep.
And a liar.
And a greedy bastard.
And a hypocrite.. 4 kids and he says population growth will ruin us all.
I’m sure the ABC will expose him.
Couldn’t they have invited Monckton to debate him? Why give him a whole hour to peddle his one sided tirade? Who else apart from ex-PM’s have they ever made such allowances for??