All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled. Dr David Deming

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:

Wednesday, 9 October 2013

Rising Sea Levels

Rising Sea Levels?

by Anthony Cox

Damon Cronshaw’s article about rising sea levels drowning the CBD of Newcastle had its amusing side with a shark meandering up King Street. However, given the chronic failure of predictions by the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change [IPCC] there is probably an equal chance of that shark getting a speeding ticket as there is King Street having enough water covering it to allow the shark to swim up it.

The IPCC has just released its fifth report, AR5. Chapter 13 of AR5 deals with sea level rise. Chapter 13 predicts a sea level rise of between 0.26 and 0.97 of a metre by the year 2100. So even if the worst prediction by the IPCC of 0.97 metres comes true the shark will lose a lot of bark from the road surface as it swims up King Street.

Sea rise comes about from 3 different causes.

Firstly there is steric sea rise which is based on a warming sea and thermal expansion of the water. Chapter 13 of AR5 is very confident there is thermal expansion. However it is indisputable that the sea surface has COOLED since 2003.

And the ocean down to 700 metres has warmed less than 0.01C since 2003 which is statistically insignificant from zero.

The IPCC claims the missing heat is at the ocean bottom but has yet to explain how the heat can go past the top of the ocean without leaving any trace of warming.

The second way the sea level can rise is through eustatic rise. Eustatic rise is by extra water coming into the ocean. The main source of fresh water into the ocean is from the world’s biggest sources of freshwater, Greenland and the Antarctic.

New research from 2012 shows both the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have decreases in ice in some regions matched by ice increase in other parts.

So it appears the sea level rise can’t be from either warming or more water.

The final way sea level can rise is through isostatic processes or movement in the land itself. But this process has nothing to do with climate.

Given this can we be sure sea level is rising. Two definitive studies of sea level were done in 2011. The first by Houston and Dean looked at global sea level and concluded the rate of sea level rise was decreasing not increasing as Chapter 13 of AR5 predicts.

The second study was by Australian researcher Dr Phil Watson from the NSW Department of the Environment. Dr Watson also concluded that sea level rate of increase was declining and there was no sign of the acceleration in sea level rise predicted by the IPCC.

Newcastle measurement of sea level rise is by the international group Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level [PSMSL]. PSMSL has four sea level gauges at Newcastle.

The gauges have been in use for varying periods of time. 
  • Gauge 1 shows an abrupt increase in 1948, probably due to isostasy and no increase from 1950 to 1960.
  • Gauge 2 shows a decrease from 1972 to 1983.
  • Gauge 3 shows a decrease from 1975 to 1990.
  • Gauge 4 shows a decrease from 2000.

In other words the only way our shark is going up King Street is as fish and chips.


  1. If the IPCC were telling the truth about increased temperatures over 700m down (where nobody can check) would this not mean a minor but non-zero expansion which should, in theory, be estimable.

    A non-zero expansion of seawater averaging about 2,000 m should be significant - I mean cms or at least several mms if increased sea level.

  2. If there is an estimated amount of extra heat in the oceans, irrespective of whether it is all below 700m (where it can't be detected) will this not mean a tiny but calculable expansion of the water. With an average sea depth of about 2,000 m even a tiny expansion would mean sea level rise. Merely 1 part in a million would be a 2mm rise outwith the normal trend - which there hasn't been.

  3. So if the alarmists are so concerned why did Gillard and Flannery both purchase waterfront properties .
    Will they get some sort of government payout that we don't know about, if the sea takes their land


All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!