All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled. Dr David Deming

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf

Monday, 29 July 2013

Australian Prime Minister Amazingly ignorant on Climate Matters

In the campaign leading up to his first incarnation as Prime Minister Kevin Rudd described "Climate Change" as ""the greatest moral, economic and social challenge of our time." Why is it, then that he is so ignorant on "climate change." In an interview with Andrew Bolt, he displayed amazing ignorance on 'climate change.' Interview link.


RUDD: The International Panel of Climate Change scientists that you just referred to contains within it 4,000 scientists
No, PM, it is NOT the International Panel, it is the Intergovernmental Panel. It is a political body and not a scientific one.

And, does it contain within it 4000 scientists? No, it doesn't employ scientists. And 4000? Try just 5, PM.

John McLean examined the IPCC's 4AR and found the working group on "Climate change" found "just 5 reviewers endorsed the chapter but most of those had potential vested interests." (link)
The IPCC leads us to believe that over 600 impartial reviewers diligently examined chapter 9 and a very high proportion agreed with its findings. It is difficult to see how this impression could be much further from the truth - 7 reviewers who were probably impartial, only 2 of whom made more than one comment; just 5 reviewers endorsed the chapter but most of those had potential vested interests.
Rudd also referred to the CSIRO.

The second source of authority, as the Prime Minister of Australia, is the CSIRO. And the CSIRO, which is a body which has existed in this country since the 1930s, analyses climate change science     
To quote Des Moore of the Institute for Private Enterprise:
Rudd claims the CSIRO supports taking action (to reduce emissions) because failure to do so will “see an increase in extreme weather events and ... an increase in drought events” in certain parts of Australia. Leaving aside analytical errors in this area made  by CSIRO and it’s now obvious warmist bias, Rudd seems unaware of the IPCC report playing down the risk of extreme weather events and giving increased weight to the pursuit of adaptive policies.
Perhaps the PM should read Graham Williamson's book on the CSIRO titled "Loss of Independence and Integrity." See also: CSIR Oh! Your victims speak out!

And please, PM, don't used the pejorative term "Climate Change Denier," especially to sceptics who know that climate changes.

 

5 comments:

  1. I always find it funny how deniers of anthropogenic climate change claim it is wrong to call them deniers, because they dont deny that the climate changes naturally. Very amusing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, blogger for a day, climatradapt, nlot only do we know that climate changes naturally, we also know that there is anthropogenic climate change. We do not accept that there is catastrophic climate changed caused by man's emissions of vital-to-life carbon dioxide.

      Who are the true deniers?

      The flat-earthers, those who believe (or pretend to believe) that climate hadn't changed since time immemorial and suddenly had an upturn in temperature in the late 20th century; the deniers who, to support their alarmist ideas, issued a ridiculous (and ridiculed) hockey-stick graph.

      Delete
    2. Have a look at the dictionary. Denier is, and always has been, a measurement of fibre thickness.
      Advocates of CAGW need to re-think their position. I doubt, given the latching-on to the denier tag, that any CAGW advocates have a capacity for independent thought.
      This is an observation.

      Delete
  2. Yes please give us all a banker imposed ETS scheme yippee!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Carbon Exchange says it all.........The shareholders in this exchange are laughing all the way to the bank....who would have thought people would have fallen for the sale of AIR....Time to speak up Australians.

    ReplyDelete





All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!