They maintain that they are right.
They maintain that they have the data.
How is it then, that for two years (well since Nov 8th, 2010) there has been a challenge issued by Peter Laux on Denis Rancourt's Climate Guy blog (link): (also posted on this blog HERE)
"$10,000 (AUS) for a conclusive argument based on empirical facts that increasing atmospheric CO2 from fossil fuel burning drives global climate warming.”Two years and nothing of relevance or, as Peter put it today:
'nary a nibble from the "Science for the Unsettled" crew.'