......global warming over the past century was only about one-half [0.42°C] of that claimed by the IPCC [0.7-0.8°C]. The paper finds that in 2/3 (67%) of the weather stations examined, questionable adjustments were made to raw data that resulted in "increased positive trends, decreased negative trends, or changed negative trends to positive," whereas "the expected proportions would be 1/2 (50%)."
nvestigation of methods for hydroclimatic data homogenization
Steirou, E., and D. Koutsoyiannis, Investigation of methods for hydroclimatic data homogenization, European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2012, Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 14, Vienna, 956-1, European Geosciences Union, 2012.
Read More at Hockeyschtick.
It's not even peer reviewed.
ReplyDeleteAlso this:
"of 67% of the weather stations examined, questionable adjustments were made to raw data that resulted in: "Increased positive trends, decreased negative trends, or changed negative trends to positive,” whereas “the expected proportions would be 1/2 (50%)."
is plainly false.
http://www.geophysical-research-abstracts.net/volumes.html
ReplyDeleteSee volume 14....
See next post on peer review deceptiom
ReplyDeletePoor old Al Einstein didn't get his theory of relativity peer reviewed. Shame, Al, Shame.
ReplyDelete