All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled. Dr David Deming

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:

Friday, 15 June 2012

Climate Expertise and Cherry Pickers

Flawed Hockey Stick brought to you by

A comment was made on this blog previously by "anonymous." Anonymous describes himself as a scientist who does field work. As he refuses to disclose his "field" of expertise, I can only surmise that his field work must be picking cherries as he dismissed anything written in the field of climate change not written by "climatologists."  He wrote
"...because he is famous and an expert in other areas, that somehow qualifies him as an expert on climate, which of course is ridiculous."
So what the CSP (he means the NO CARBON TAX climate sceptics (NCTCS) party ) are (sic)  doing is relying on non-specialists, more often than not with vested interests, to give them information. I can only wonder, if they will apply the same logic if their house needs rewiring or if they need to know how to treat brain cancer? Rather then take the advice of specialist oncologists will they instead seek advice from the retired veterinarian up the road? After all, he’s a doctor too.
So, you can only rely on "climatologists," scientists whose field is climatology.

He therefore would dismiss (as we do) the IPCC assessment reports -exposed by Donna Lafromboise's “The Delinquent Teenager Who Was Mistaken for the World’s Top Climate Expert“ a book that describes how the IPCC includes green lobbyists and others too biased, or too misinformed to have any place on such an important UN body.
“This expose, by an investigative journalist, is the product of two years of research. Its conclusion: almost nothing we’ve been told about the IPCC is true.
He would also dismiss:-
  • James Hansen - astrophysicist - head of NASA:GISS;
  • Rajendra Pachauri chairman of the  aforementioned IPCC - an engineer;
  • Ross Garnaut - author of the Garnaut Review - an economist;
  • Nicholas Stern - The Stern Review - an economist;
  • Tim Flannery - Australia's part-time Panasonic Climate Change Commissioner - mammalogist - previously his writings have been exposed by "The Weather Makers Re-examined;"
  • Michael E. Mann - of the flawed "hockey stick" - Physicist and Geologist;
  • Gavin Schmidt - NASA:GISSApplied Mathematics;
  • Joseph Fourier - Mathematician and Physicist;
  • Peter Gleik - Scientific Ethics and Integrity- excuse me, I had to go outside and laugh at that one;
  • Kevin Trenberth - Meteorologist; "it's a tragedy..."
  • and most of the people of the ClimateGate CRU.....


  1. It could be that they are picking their noses instead of cherries.Is climatology related to scientology,it would explain a lot wouldn't it?

  2. I actually astonished when using the assessment you've made for making this specific actual submit extraordinary. Excellent process!

  3. I like your web site and I am thinking regardless of whether I could use your words in my function? Would it be feasible?

  4. Thanks for sharing. Looking forward to a lot more.

  5. Thanks for nice blog, really nice information. I have bookmarked this blog. Keep it update.


  6. I wish more people would write blogs like this that are really fun to read. With all the fluff floating around on the net, it is rare to read a blog like this instead.


All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!