All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled. Dr David Deming

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf

Monday, 23 January 2012

The case against CO2 - IPCC must be wrong.

No explanation needed. CO2 is innocent. IPCC guilty of deception.
From C3 Headlines (LINK)
h/t Jim H

14 comments:

  1. Would it be possible to get a reference for the graph, thanks, mark

    ReplyDelete
  2. This graph doesn't give any andication about the source of the data, it's not even clear what exactly has been depicted here.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Actually, the data sources are listed vertically along the right side of the graph. If it is not clear what the graph represents, go to the link provided for an explanation.

    C3 Editor

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks, C3, for both the original post and the reply comment!

    ReplyDelete
  5. The source of the data ist well hidden, and there is no source given for the CO2 data from 1912-1957. In addition it's not clear, how the temperature increases were calculated.

    ReplyDelete
  6. As mentioned by C3 Editor in the comment above the source of the data can be found st the link provided:

    http://www.c3headlines.com/2012/01/noaas-2011-global-temperature-dataset-released-confirms-that-ipccs-global-warming-is-doa.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Once again: there is no source for all the CO2 data used, and it is not indicated how the temperature increases have been calculated. It seems that this graph is not based on existing data. Please remove it.

      Delete
  7. Once again, the link to the data iis at the bottom of the C3 post.

    If you can't follow that, please remove yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Without supporting data and explanations, this figure is meaningless.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It is good that there is supporting data and explanations at the link provided.

    ReplyDelete
  11. There is some supporting data, but not complete, and no explanation about the calculation has been provided.

    ReplyDelete
  12. No explanations, this figure is just a fraud.

    ReplyDelete





All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!