No explanation needed. CO2 is innocent. IPCC guilty of deception.
From C3 Headlines (LINK)
h/t Jim H
The Official blog of Australia's (AEC registered) NO CARBON TAX Climate Sceptics party (NCTCS)
The Official blog of Australia's (AEC registered) NO CARBON TAX Climate Sceptics party (NCTCS)
Would it be possible to get a reference for the graph, thanks, mark
ReplyDeleteLink added above - Cheers
ReplyDeleteThis graph doesn't give any andication about the source of the data, it's not even clear what exactly has been depicted here.
ReplyDeleteActually, the data sources are listed vertically along the right side of the graph. If it is not clear what the graph represents, go to the link provided for an explanation.
ReplyDeleteC3 Editor
Thanks, C3, for both the original post and the reply comment!
ReplyDeleteThe source of the data ist well hidden, and there is no source given for the CO2 data from 1912-1957. In addition it's not clear, how the temperature increases were calculated.
ReplyDeleteAs mentioned by C3 Editor in the comment above the source of the data can be found st the link provided:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.c3headlines.com/2012/01/noaas-2011-global-temperature-dataset-released-confirms-that-ipccs-global-warming-is-doa.html
Once again: there is no source for all the CO2 data used, and it is not indicated how the temperature increases have been calculated. It seems that this graph is not based on existing data. Please remove it.
DeleteOnce again, the link to the data iis at the bottom of the C3 post.
ReplyDeleteIf you can't follow that, please remove yourself.
Without supporting data and explanations, this figure is meaningless.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIt is good that there is supporting data and explanations at the link provided.
ReplyDeleteThere is some supporting data, but not complete, and no explanation about the calculation has been provided.
ReplyDeleteNo explanations, this figure is just a fraud.
ReplyDelete