Thursday, 15 December 2011

Questions for a recalcitrant Prime Minister.

The Prime Minister has laughed about it with that faked laugh of hers, but never has she answered what has become known as "The Andrew Bolt Question:" How much will the carbon tax reduce global temperatures?

On WorldNetDaily Leighton Steward has a few more questions that should be answered by our recalcitrant Prime Minister and her Green Gillard Government Gang; the gang that are forcing an unwanted carbon (dioxide) tax on Australia.

Leighton's questions:
  1. Why can't warming alarmists (and therefore our government) produce a single legitimate example of empirical evidence to support the man-made global-warming hypothesis?
  2. Why has Earth been warming for 300 years when man has only emitted measurable amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere for the last 150 years?
  3. Why did Earth cool for 500 years before the recent 300 year warming and warm for several hundred years before that when even the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says CO2 levels did not change?
  4. Why was the Medieval Warm Period, a thousand years ago, warmer than today even though the CO2 level was 38 percent lower than today?
  5. Why did many of Earth's major glaciers in the Alps, Asia, New Zealand and Patagonia begin to retreat nearly half a century before the Industrial Revolution and man's CO2 emissions?
  6. Of the last five interglacials, going back 400,000 years, why is our current interglacial the coolest of the five even though Earth's CO2 level is about 35 percent higher?
  7. Why has our current 10,000-year-long Holocene epoch been warmer than today for 50 percent of the time when CO2 levels were about 35 percent lower than today?
  8. Why are correlations of Earth's temperature with natural factors such as sunspot numbers, solar cycle lengths, solar magnetic variations and changes in major ocean currents all better than the correlation of Earth's temperature with CO2 levels?
 Surely just a little to ask before introducing a tax that will hurt Australia's economy. Canada has worked out that a Kyoto commitment will be a large hit their economy:
Ottawa's decision to opt out of Kyoto - which it labelled an "impediment" to effective global action - means it won't be slugged $14 billion in penalties for not achieving its 2012 emission reduction targets.

Image:  Larry Pickering
Well, climate change is a very difficult problem and of course the science is telling us that we need to make significant cuts in greenhouse gas emissions and that is why, of course, Australia has legislated its carbon price mechanism so that we can make cuts in our emissions at least cost to our economy and at least cost to households. 
The Science is telling us, Greg? What science? Can you answer the above 8 questions? Can you at least answer question 1:
Can you produce a single legitimate example of empirical evidence to support the man-made global-warming hypothesis?
Albert Einstein once said, “No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.” A hypothesis only has to be falsified once! The man-made global warming hypothesis has been falsified number of times.

No comments:

Post a comment

All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!