After hearing predictions of the impact that global warming could have on WA farming, Bill Crabtree and David Falconer approached UWA to hold a debate representing both sides of the global warming argument.No Speakers could be found for the Pro-Global warming Side? What, not one single alarmist? What about MS Natalie Latter who was so vocal in her opposition to Lord Monckton's appearance at Notre Dame University recently? What about the 50 academics that Ms Latter organised to sign an anti-Monckton letter? Not one of them fit to speak for the falsified AGW hypothesis? Or too scared to face the credible anti alarmist team?
They said after getting the initial go-ahead from UWA's vice-chancellor Alan Robson they were told that no speakers could be found for the pro-global warming side and that the speakers the pair had organised to speak against global warming were not credible enough to speak at a debate on UWA grounds.
The report says that the pair "organised to speak against global warming were not credible enough to speak at a debate on UWA grounds." Oh really? Were they not credible enough or were they too credible and scared off the alarmist opposition?
Who were these "not credible enough" academics.
William Kininmonth was credible enough to head Australia's Climate Centre, was credible enough to be Australia's delegate to the WMO.
David was credible enough to work for the Dept of Climate Change. He was credible enough to build the carbon accounting model for the Australian Government.
Not credible enough? How dare they say that Perhaps the UWA has lost much credibility in this cancelled debate.