All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled. Dr David Deming

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at:

Wednesday, 5 October 2011

UWA, Natalie Latter and Alarmists

It has been reported that the University of WA has backed away from a debate on Climate Change.

UWA backs away from climate change debate

After hearing predictions of the impact that global warming could have on WA farming, Bill Crabtree and David Falconer approached UWA to hold a debate representing both sides of the global warming argument.
They said after getting the initial go-ahead from UWA's vice-chancellor Alan Robson they were told that no speakers could be found for the pro-global warming side and that the speakers the pair had organised to speak against global warming were not credible enough to speak at a debate on UWA grounds.
No Speakers could be found for the Pro-Global warming Side? What, not one single alarmist? What about MS Natalie Latter who was so vocal in her opposition to Lord Monckton's appearance at Notre Dame University recently? What about the 50 academics that Ms Latter organised to  sign an anti-Monckton letter? Not one of them fit to speak for the falsified AGW hypothesis? Or too scared to face the credible anti alarmist team?

The report says that the pair "organised to speak against global warming were not credible enough to speak at a debate on UWA grounds." Oh really? Were they not credible enough or were they too credible and scared off the alarmist opposition?

Who were these "not credible enough" academics.

William Kininmonth has a career in meteorological science and policy spanning more than 40 years. For more than a decade (1986-1998) he headed Australia's National Climate Centre with responsibilities for monitoring Australia's changing climate and advising the Australian government on the extent and severity of climate extremes, including the recurring drought episodes of the 1990s.
He has extensive knowledge of global climatology, the climate system and the impacts of climate extremes developed through more than two decades associated with the World Meteorological Organization. He was Australia's delegate to the WMO Commission for Climatology and more recently has been a consultant for implementation of its programs. He coordinated the scientific and technical review for the United Nations Task Force on El Niño following the disastrous 1997-1998 event, has participated in WMO expert working groups.
As a member of Australia's delegations to the Second World Climate Conference (1990) and the subsequent intergovernmental negotiations for the Framework Convention on Climate Change (1991-1992), William Kininmonth had a close association with the early developments of the climate change debate. 

William Kininmonth was credible enough to head Australia's Climate Centre, was credible enough to be Australia's delegate to the WMO.

David Evans

Dr David Evans worked for the Australian Greenhouse Office (Now the Dept of Climate Change) from 1999 to 2005, building the carbon accounting model that Australia uses to track carbon in its biosphere for the purposes of the Kyoto Protocol. He is a mathematician and engineer, with six university degrees including a PhD from Stanford University.

David was credible enough to work for the Dept of Climate Change. He was credible enough to build the carbon accounting model for the Australian Government.

Not credible enough? How dare they say that Perhaps the UWA has lost much credibility in this cancelled debate.

No comments:

Post a Comment

All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!