Deniers and Pushers - stop denying and push off.

The Sun viewed in visible light,
at minimum phase (2006) and
maximum phase (2001)
Who are the pushers? The pushers are those people - scientists, politicians, journalists and bankers - who are for various reasons pushing and continue to push the falsified hypothesis that man made carbon dioxide emissions are causing runaway global warming.

Who are the deniers? Well, although they say that the realists and sceptics are the deniers, these same  pushers - scientists, politicians, journalists and bankers - are in fact the deniers. The pushers say that the realists and sceptics deny "the science" and are not published  in peer review journals.

How about this for a classic case of denial? Ferenc Miskolczi authored a paper whilst working for NASA, but, because it went against the hypothesis, NASA (deniers) refused to have it published and eventually the paper was published in a scientific journal in his native Hungary. See discussion on Miskolczi here:
Dr. Miskolczi first published his work in the Quarterly Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Services in 2004, Volume 108, No 4. He published further statistical proof in the same Journal in 2007, Volume 111, No. 1. In the 5 years since he first published his results, not one peer review has come back disproving his theory, or his Constant. To date, not one scientist has come forward to disprove Miskolczi’s theory that the Earth’s climate is at equilibrium, and that Carbon Dioxide cannot be released in amounts great enough to upset that equilibrium.

Fellow Hungarian Miklos Zagoni also wrote a paper on Miskolczi's Saturated Greenhouse Effect.

The Denial? Well, after The Climate Sceptics party advertised Miskolczi, the Australian Government tried to refute it and actually said that it was only published in a lesser peer review journal. See HERE.

Let's just look at this year. Papers issued that refute the man made CO2 emissions hypothesis:
  • CERN's Cloud ("Cosmics Leaving OUtdoor Droplets") experiment published in Nature;
  • Spencer and Braswell,  Published in Remote Sensing On the Misdiagnosis of Climate Feedbacks from Variations in Earth's Radiant Energy Balance
not to mention this release from National Solar Observatory.


Even Wikipedia admits that there was lower solar activity during the Maunder Minimum.

The denials continue. Arctic ice is growing. 

2011 Ice Is 9% Higher Than The Same Date In 2007

Green is 2011 ice not present in 2007. Red is the opposite. There is a lot more ice today than the same date in 2007. 

Not what the deniers say. They say that there is less ice.
Time to re-think who are the deniers and who are the realists.