|The Sun viewed in visible light, |
at minimum phase (2006) and
maximum phase (2001)
Who are the deniers? Well, although they say that the realists and sceptics are the deniers, these same pushers - scientists, politicians, journalists and bankers - are in fact the deniers. The pushers say that the realists and sceptics deny "the science" and are not published in peer review journals.
How about this for a classic case of denial? Ferenc Miskolczi authored a paper whilst working for NASA, but, because it went against the hypothesis, NASA (deniers) refused to have it published and eventually the paper was published in a scientific journal in his native Hungary. See discussion on Miskolczi here:
Dr. Miskolczi first published his work in the Quarterly Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Services in 2004, Volume 108, No 4. He published further statistical proof in the same Journal in 2007, Volume 111, No. 1. In the 5 years since he first published his results, not one peer review has come back disproving his theory, or his Constant. To date, not one scientist has come forward to disprove Miskolczi’s theory that the Earth’s climate is at equilibrium, and that Carbon Dioxide cannot be released in amounts great enough to upset that equilibrium.
Fellow Hungarian Miklos Zagoni also wrote a paper on Miskolczi's Saturated Greenhouse Effect.
The Denial? Well, after The Climate Sceptics party advertised Miskolczi, the Australian Government tried to refute it and actually said that it was only published in a lesser peer review journal. See HERE.
Let's just look at this year. Papers issued that refute the man made CO2 emissions hypothesis:
- CERN's Cloud ("Cosmics Leaving OUtdoor Droplets") experiment published in Nature;
- Spencer and Braswell, Published in Remote Sensing On the Misdiagnosis of Climate Feedbacks from Variations in Earth's Radiant Energy Balance