All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled. Dr David Deming

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf

Tuesday, 21 June 2011

Falsification confirmed - Please Arrange funeral for the AGW hypothesis

When I posted the Bob Carter videos, in the post: "The hypothesis was falsified years ago..." I had many emails saying that temperatures are still rising. Steve Goodard has posted, using the marvellous Wood for Trees facility,  that

GISS Shows No Warming Over The Last Decade

supported by graphs using the GISS temperature records and the Hadley CRUT records. Whilst CO2 levels continue to rise, GISS shows no temperature rise in the last decade, and the CRUT graph shows temperatures falling.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From Steve's REAL SCIENCE:
Even with Hansen’s phony Arctic pink, he can’t keep temperatures rising.
Had CRUT uses a more legitimate scientific approach, and they show temperatures declining over the last decade.

 

5 comments:

  1. Stoop Davy Dave21 June 2011 at 19:55

    But if the Earth's not getting hotter, then how do you explain all the billions in grant money and speaking fees absorbed by the Climate Hysteria Movement, huh?

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're not paying attention, Snoop Doggie, or are you?

    The con is the grant money.

    Well done for pointing that out!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Incidently, Stoop Daive Davy. If the science is settled, as the scammers keep saying, then how is it that they want more research funds??

    ReplyDelete
  4. Stoop Davy Dave21 June 2011 at 20:30

    But but but see but that just means it's MORE IMPORTANT THAN EVER to ... um to accomplish their important goals! Yes. They're here to stop the climate from changing, and it's an emergency, so more well-funded research is more critical than ever!
    Or something like that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There's a direct co-relation between research funds and 'man-made global warming'. Stopping these funds would solve that problem immediately.

    ReplyDelete





All serious comments published after moderation.
Comments should be polite, and respect all views.
No bad language. Spam never makes it!